Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials Clinical article

被引:110
作者
Upadhyaya, Cheerag D. [2 ]
Wu, Jau-Ching [1 ,2 ]
Trost, Gregory [7 ]
Haid, Regis W. [3 ]
Traynelis, Vincent C. [4 ]
Tay, Bobby [5 ]
Coric, Domagoj [6 ]
Mummaneni, Praveen V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Neurol Inst, Dept Neurosurg, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Atlanta Brain & Spine, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Carolina Neurosurg & Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin Hosp & Clin, Dept Neurol Surg, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
degenerative disc disease; cervical arthroplasty; clinical trial; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; cervical; DISC ARTHROPLASTY; ADVERSE EVENTS; PRESTIGE LP; FUSION; BRYAN; SPINE; PROSTHESIS; DISKECTOMY; EXPERIENCE; ADJACENT;
D O I
10.3171/2011.6.SPINE10623
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Object. There are now 3 randomized, multicenter, US FDA investigational device exemption, industry-sponsored studies comparing arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for single-level cervical disease with 2 years of follow-up. These 3 studies evaluated the Prestige ST, Bryan, and ProDisc-C artificial discs. The authors analyzed the combined results of these trials. Methods. A total of 1213 patients with symptomatic, single-level cervical disc disease were randomized into 2 treatment arms in the 3 randomized trials. Six hundred twenty-one patients received an artificial cervical disc, and 592 patients were treated with ACDF. In the three trials, 94% of the arthroplasty group and 87% of the ACDF group have completed 2 years of follow-up. The authors analyzed the 2-year data from these 3 trials including previously unpublished source data. Statistical analysis was performed with fixed and random effects models. Results. The authors' analysis revealed that segmental sagittal motion was preserved with arthroplasty (preoperatively 7.26 degrees and postoperatively 8.14 degrees) at the 2-year time point. The fusion rate for ACDF at 2 years was 95%. The Neck Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Mental, and Physical Component Summaries, neck pain, and arm pain scores were not statistically different between the groups at the 24-month follow-up. The arthroplasty group demonstrated superior results at 24 months in neurological success (RR 0.595, I-2 = 0%, p = 0.006). The arthroplasty group had a lower rate of secondary surgeries at the 2-year time point (RR 0.44, I-2 = 0%, p = 0.004). At the 2-year time point, the reoperation rate for adjacent-level disease was lower for the arthroplasty group when the authors analyzed the combined data set using a fixed effects model (RR 0.460, I-2 = 2.9%, p = 0.030), but this finding was not significant using a random effects model. Adverse event reporting was too heterogeneous between the 3 trials to combine for analysis. Conclusions. Both anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as well as arthroplasty demonstrate excellent 2-year surgical results for the treatment of 1 -level cervical disc disease with radiculopathy. Arthroplasty is associated with a lower rate of secondary surgery and a higher rate of neurological success at 2 years. Arthroplasty may be associated with a lower rate of adjacent-level disease at 2 years, but further follow-up and analysis are needed to confirm this finding. (DOI: 10.3171/2011.6.SPINE10623)
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 228
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
Prospective randomized controlled study of the Bryan Cervical Disc: early clinical results from a single investigational site - Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2005 [J].
Coric, D ;
Finger, F ;
Boltes, P .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2006, 4 (01) :31-35
[2]
Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine:: a metaanalysis of fusion rates [J].
Fraser, Jusun F. ;
Haertl, Roger .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 6 (04) :298-303
[3]
Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis [J].
Goffin, J ;
Casey, A ;
Kehr, P ;
Liebig, K ;
Lind, B ;
Logroscino, C ;
Pointillart, V ;
Van Calenbergh, F ;
van Loon, J .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (03) :840-845
[4]
Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: Single-level and bi-level [J].
Goffin, J ;
Van Calenbergh, F ;
van Loon, J ;
Casey, A ;
Kehr, P ;
Liebig, K ;
Lind, B ;
Logroscino, C ;
Sgrambiglia, R ;
Pointillart, V .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (24) :2673-2678
[5]
Comparison of BRYAN Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Clinical and Radiographic Results of a Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial [J].
Heller, John G. ;
Sasso, Rick C. ;
Papadopoulos, Stephen M. ;
Anderson, Paul A. ;
Fessler, Richard G. ;
Hacker, Robert J. ;
Coric, Domagoj ;
Cauthen, Joseph C. ;
Riew, Daniel K. .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (02) :101-107
[6]
Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis [J].
Hilibrand, AS ;
Carlson, GD ;
Palumbo, MA ;
Jones, PK ;
Bohlman, HH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (04) :519-528
[8]
Adverse events: The more you search, the more you find [J].
Ioannidis, JPA ;
Mulrow, CD ;
Goodman, SN .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 144 (04) :298-300
[9]
Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study [J].
Kang, Heesuk ;
Park, Paul ;
La Marca, Frank ;
Hollister, Scott J. ;
Lin, Chia-Ying .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2010, 28 (06) :1-8
[10]
Link Helmut D, 2004, Spine J, V4, p294S, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.022