Computing and recomputing discourse models: An ERP study

被引:76
作者
Baggio, Giosue [1 ]
van Lambalgen, Michiel [2 ]
Hagoort, Peter [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, FC Donders Ctr Cognit Neuroimaging, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Log Language & Computat, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
semantics; discourse; non-monotonicity; ERPs; sustained anterior negativity;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.005
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
While syntactic reanalysis has been extensively investigated in psycholinguistics, comparatively little is known about reanalysis in the semantic domain. We used event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to keep track of semantic processes involved in understanding short narratives such as 'The girl was writing a letter when her friend spilled coffee on the paper'. We hypothesize that these sentences are interpreted in two steps: (1) when the progressive clause is processed, a discourse model is computed in which the goal state (a complete letter) is predicted to hold; (2) when the subordinate clause is processed, the initial representation is recomputed to the effect that, in the final discourse structure, the goal state is not satisfied. Critical sentences evoked larger sustained anterior negativities (SANs) compared to controls, starting around 400 ms following the onset of the sentence-final word, and lasting for about 400 ms. The amplitude of the SAN was correlated with the frequency with which participants, in an offline probe-selection task, responded that the goal state was not attained. Our results raise the possibility that the brain supports some form of non-monotonic recomputation to integrate information which invalidates previously held assumptions. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 53
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
[41]   Semantic interpretation as computation in nonmonotonic logic: The real meaning of the suppression task [J].
Stenning, K ;
van Lambalgen, M .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2005, 29 (06) :919-960
[42]  
Stenning K, 2008, HUMAN REASONING AND COGNITIVE SCIENCE, P1
[43]  
STENNING K, 2008, PSYCHOL CONDITIONALS
[44]   Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery [J].
Sturt, Patrick .
COGNITION, 2007, 105 (02) :477-488
[45]   Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400 [J].
van Berkum, JJA ;
Hagoort, P ;
Brown, CM .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 11 (06) :657-671
[46]   When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect [J].
van Berkum, JJA ;
Zwisterlood, P ;
Hagoort, P ;
Brown, CM .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 17 (03) :701-718
[47]   Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension [J].
van Berkum, JJA ;
Brown, CM ;
Hagoort, P ;
Zwitserlood, P .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 40 (02) :235-248
[48]   Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials [J].
van Berkum, JJA ;
Brown, CM ;
Hagoort, P .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 41 (02) :147-182
[49]  
VanLambalgen M, 2005, EXPLOR SEMANT, P1, DOI 10.1002/9780470759257
[50]  
VANLAMBALGEN M, J LOGIC LANGUAGE INF