The use of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery for total knee replacement in daily practice: a survey among ESSKA/SGO-SSO members

被引:26
作者
Friederich, N. [1 ]
Verdonk, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Kantonsspital, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, CH-4101 Basel, Switzerland
[2] State Univ Ghent Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
computer-assisted surgery; surgical navigation; orthopedic surgery; total knee replacement; survey;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-008-0518-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) for total knee arthroplasty is an emerging surgical tool, yet little is known about how it is being used in everyday orthopedic centers. We sought to better understand physicians' current practices and beliefs on this topic through performing a Web-based survey. Between December 2006 and January 2007, a 24-question survey was emailed to 3,330 members of the European Society of Sports Traumatology Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) and the Swiss Orthopedic Society (SGO-SSO), with 389 (11.7%) agreeing to participate. Of this group, 202 (51.9%) reported that their center was equipped with a navigation system, which was an image-free based system for most (83.2%) and was primarily used for total knee arthroplasty (61.4%). In terms of the proportion of use, 50.5% of respondents used their navigation system in less than 25% of cases, 16.3% in 25-50% of cases, 7.4% in 51-75% of cases, and 25.7% in more than 75% of cases. The potential for improving the alignment of prosthesis was the most strongly cited reason for using a navigation system, while the potential for increasing operation times and the risk of infections were the most strongly cited reasons for not using a navigation system. Approximately half of respondents surveyed believed navigation systems were a real innovation contributing to the improvement of total knee implantation. However, heavy usage of computer-assisted navigation (C51% of cases) was observed in only 33.1% of respondents, with only a quarter using it at rates that could be considered frequent (> 75% of cases). Forty-eight percent of respondents said they will use a navigation system in more cases and 39.1% that their usage will stay the same. These findings indicate that CAOS is being used only moderately in current practices, though respondents generally had a positive opinion of its potential benefits. Physicians may be awaiting more data before adopting the use of these systems, though survey responses also suggest a projected increase in their use in the coming years.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 543
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
Alignment in total knee arthroplasty -: A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique [J].
Bäthis, H ;
Perlick, L ;
Tingart, M ;
Lüring, C ;
Zurakowski, D ;
Grifka, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (05) :682-687
[2]
Navigated total knee replacement - A meta-analysis [J].
Bauwens, Kai ;
Matthes, Gerrit ;
Wich, Michael ;
Gebhard, Florian ;
Hanson, Beate ;
Ekkernkamp, Axel ;
Stengel, Dirk .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (02) :261-269
[3]
Computer-assisted surgery: A wine before its time - In the affirmative [J].
Callaghan, John J. ;
Liu, Steve S. ;
Warth, Lucian C. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (04) :27-28
[4]
Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique -: A randomised, prospective trial [J].
Chauhan, SK ;
Scott, RG ;
Breidahl, W ;
Beaver, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (03) :372-377
[5]
Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement - A prospective, randomised controlled study of the Acrobot system [J].
Cobb, J ;
Henckel, J ;
Gomes, P ;
Harris, S ;
Jakopec, M ;
Rodriguez y Baena, F ;
Barrett, A ;
Davies, B .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (02) :188-197
[6]
Daubresse Francois, 2005, Acta Orthop Belg, V71, P710
[7]
Robotic control in knee joint replacement surgery [J].
Davies, B. L. ;
Rodriguez y Baena, F. M. ;
Barrett, A. R. W. ;
Gomes, M. P. S. F. ;
Harris, S. J. ;
Jakopec, M. ;
Cobb, J. P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2007, 221 (H1) :71-80
[8]
Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: A Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement [J].
Dong, HJ ;
Buxton, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 22 (02) :191-202
[9]
*EUR SOC OP MARK R, ESOMAR WORLD RES COD
[10]
Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty [J].
Haaker, RG ;
Stockheim, M ;
Kamp, M ;
Proff, G ;
Breitenfelder, J ;
Ottersbach, A .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, (433) :152-159