Correlations between the step activity monitor and the DynaPort ADL-monitor

被引:27
作者
Brandes, M [1 ]
Rosenbaum, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Muenster, Dept Orthopaed, Movement Anal Lab, D-48149 Munster, Germany
关键词
physical activity assessment; activities of daily living; step activity; accelerometry; ADL-monitoring; correlations;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.08.001
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. This study was performed to evaluate correlations between the DynaPort activity of daily living monitor and the step activity monitor. Design. Experimental study with repeated measures. Background. Physical activity becomes more important to assess quality of life, e.g. after clinical interventions such as joint replacement surgery. Methods. Nine subjects wore both devices simultaneously for two days. Limitations and technical problems caused by the devices were assessed by a questionnaire. Correlation coefficients were calculated between parameters derived from both instruments. Results. Only small limitations and problems were reported. Significant correlations were found between the number of steps (step activity monitor) and the percentage of locomotion (DynaPort) (r = 0.95), between the number of steps and the physical activity index (DynaPort) (r = 0.71) and between the physical activity index and the percentage of locomotion (r = 0.76). Wilcoxon-tests between the first and second measurement of each subject did not reveal significant differences but correlation coefficients were poor (r = 0.16-0.36). Conclusions. After one day of simultaneously wearing both devices, the percentage of locomotion can be obtained using only the step activity monitor for additional days. Poor correlations between the first and the second measurements of each subject underline the necessity to record further days to acquire the level of human physical activity.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 94
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Coleman KL, 1999, J REHABIL RES DEV, V36, P8
[2]   Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients [J].
Morlock, M ;
Schneider, E ;
Bluhm, A ;
Vollmer, M ;
Bergmann, G ;
Müller, V ;
Honl, M .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 34 (07) :873-881
[3]   Seasonal variation in adult leisure-time physical activity [J].
Pivarnik, JM ;
Reeves, MJ ;
Rafferty, AP .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2003, 35 (06) :1004-1008
[4]  
Resnick B, 2001, J Nurs Meas, V9, P275
[5]   Assessment of free-living physical activity in humans: An overview of currently available and proposed new measures [J].
Schutz, Y ;
Weinsier, RL ;
Hunter, GR .
OBESITY RESEARCH, 2001, 9 (06) :368-379
[6]   Step activity monitor: Increased accuracy in quantifying ambulatory activity [J].
Shepherd, EF ;
Toloza, E ;
McClung, CD ;
Schmalzried, TP .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1999, 17 (05) :703-708
[7]   Average patient walking activity approaches 2 million cycles per year - Pedometers under-record walking activity [J].
Silva, M ;
Shepherd, EF ;
Jackson, WO ;
Dorey, FJ ;
Schmalzried, TP .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (06) :693-697
[8]   Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents [J].
Sirard, JR ;
Pate, RR .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2001, 31 (06) :439-454
[9]  
Trost S G, 2001, Exerc Sport Sci Rev, V29, P32, DOI 10.1097/00003677-200101000-00007
[10]   Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed? [J].
Trost, SG ;
Pate, RR ;
Freedson, PS ;
Sallis, JF ;
Taylor, WC .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2000, 32 (02) :426-431