Chrysler and J. D. Power: Pioneering scientific price customization in the automobile industry

被引:4
作者
Silva-Risso, Jorge [1 ]
Shearin, William V. [2 ]
Ionova, Irina [3 ]
Khavaev, Alexei [3 ]
Borrego, Deirdre [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Anderson Grad Sch Management, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] Chrysler LLC, Norfolk, VA USA
[3] JD Power & Associates, W Lake Village, CA USA
关键词
choice models; nested logit; random coefficients; promotions; automobiles; hierarchical Bayes;
D O I
10.1287/inte.1070.0332
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Pricing is a critical component in the marketing-mix plans of automobile manufacturers. Because they tend to keep their manufacturer's suggested retail prices (MSRPs) and wholesale prices fixed throughout the model year, they customize pricing to reflect supply and demand by using incentives; in the US market, they represent approximately $ 45 billion per year. In addition, variations in capacity utilization have immediate and substantial effects on profitability. This, together with legacy costs and inflexible labor contracts, makes the effectiveness and efficiency of price-customization decisions particularly vital for the industry. Chrysler, a pioneer in using science in its pricing decisions, engaged J. D. Power and Associates (JDPA) to implement an incentive planning model. The approach used is based on a random-effects multinomial nested logit model of product ( vehicle model), acquisition ( cash, finance, lease), and program-type ( e. g., consumer cash rebates, reduced interest-rate financing, cash/reduced interest-rate combinations, lease-support) selection. The model uses sales transaction data that are collected daily from approximately 10,000 dealerships. It uses a hierarchical Bayes modeling structure to capture response heterogeneity at the local market level. This specification allows users to apply the model to pricing decisions at the local, regional, and national market levels. Based on implementing this model, Chrysler learned that, for any given price level, the pricing structure ( e. g., a combination of retail price, interest rates, or rebates) is important. The set of the most efficient pricing structures for each price level constitutes an efficient frontier; efficient pricing structures vary across products, price levels, and markets. The system provides three alternative approaches to identify efficient ( and effective) pricing programs: ( a) what-if-scenario simulations, (b) a batch scenario generator that allows users to identify and examine the pro. t-share/volume efficient frontier, and ( c) an optimizer that, given an objective and a set of constraints, allows users to search for incentive programs rapidly. The Chrysler Corporate Economics Office estimates that Chrysler's annual savings from implementing the model are approximately $ 500 million.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 39
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   AN IMPLEMENTED SYSTEM FOR IMPROVING PROMOTION PRODUCTIVITY USING STORE SCANNER DATA [J].
ABRAHAM, MM ;
LODISH, LM .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1993, 12 (03) :248-269
[2]   PROMOTER - AN AUTOMATED PROMOTION EVALUATION SYSTEM [J].
ABRAHAM, MM ;
LODISH, LM .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1987, 6 (02) :101-123
[3]   AUTOMOBILE PRICES IN MARKET EQUILIBRIUM [J].
BERRY, S ;
LEVINSOHN, J ;
PAKES, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1995, 63 (04) :841-890
[4]  
Berry Steven T., 2004, J POLITICAL EC, V89, P400
[5]   Enabling the willing: Consumer rebates for durable goods [J].
Bruce, Norris ;
Desai, Preyas ;
Staelin, Richard .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2006, 25 (04) :350-366
[6]   Commercial use of UPC scanner data: Industry and academic perspectives [J].
Bucklin, RE ;
Gupta, S .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 18 (03) :247-273
[7]  
BUCKLIN RE, 1998, 1998 INFORMS MARK SC
[8]   The impact of heterogeneity in purchase timing and price responsiveness on estimates of sticker shock effects [J].
Chang, K ;
Siddarth, S ;
Weinberg, CB .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 18 (02) :178-192
[9]  
CHANG K, 2003, 2003 INFORMS MARK SC
[10]   A BRAND SWITCHING MODEL WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR MARKETING STRATEGIES [J].
COLOMBO, RA ;
MORRISON, DG .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1989, 8 (01) :89-99