Improving mammography screening using best practices and practice enhancement assistants: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) study

被引:24
作者
Aspy, Cheryl B. [1 ]
Enright, Margaret [2 ]
Halstead, LaWanna [2 ]
Mold, James W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Family & Prevent Med, Oklahoma City, OK 73104 USA
[2] Oklahoma Fdn Med Qual, Oklahoma City, OK USA
关键词
D O I
10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.070060
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose: In 2004 only 68% of women in Oklahoma over the age of 40 reported having a mammogram in the past 2 years, compared with 75% nationally. Strategies to improve mammography rates have been numerous but have generally included single strategies, such as physician education, practice audit and feedback, and reminders; flow sheets and results have been mixed. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine the impact of a practice facilitator and "best practice" interventions on mammography rates in a practice-based research network. Methods: A total of 16 practices participated; 8 were assigned to intervention and 8 to usual care. Pre- and post-audits of mammography rates were conducted. Intervention practices received feedback with benchmarking, academic detailing, and the assistance of a practice enhancement assistant to help with practice redesign over a 9-month period. Results: The groups differed significantly for both the proportion of mammograms offered to eligible patients (P = .043) and for the proportion of patients with current mammograms (P < .015). For the control group, 38% of eligible women were offered a mammogram and 202 (35% of those eligible) actually did have documentation that a mammogram had been performed. Fifty-three percent of the eligible patients in the intervention group were offered a mammogram and 52% of those eligible (n = 332) did have documentation in the chart that the mammogram had been completed. Conclusion: The results suggest that these interventions can improve mammography rates in a range of practice settings. These findings are consistent with other studies that have tested multicomponent interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 333
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   14 years of follow-up from the Edinbugh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening [J].
Alexander, FE ;
Anderson, TJ ;
Brown, HK ;
Forrest, APM ;
Hepburn, W ;
Kirkpatrick, AE ;
Muir, BB ;
Prescott, RJ ;
Smith, A .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9168) :1903-1908
[2]  
Andersson I, 1997, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P63
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Research Randomizer
[4]  
BELCHER D W, 1988, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, V4, P27
[5]  
BELCHER DW, 1988, AM J PREV MED S, V4, P49
[6]   Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer [J].
Berry, DA ;
Cronin, KA ;
Plevritis, SK ;
Fryback, DG ;
Clarke, L ;
Zelen, M ;
Mandelblatt, JS ;
Yakovlev, AY ;
Habbema, JDF ;
Feuer, EJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (17) :1784-1792
[7]  
Bjurstam N, 1997, CANCER, V80, P2091, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971201)80:11<2091::AID-CNCR8>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-#
[9]  
*CDCP, 2004, BEH RISK FACT SURV S
[10]   Clinical decision-making in blood pressure management of patients with diabetes mellitus: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) study [J].
Cotton, Adam ;
Aspy, Cheryl B. ;
Mold, James ;
Stein, Howard .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2006, 19 (03) :232-239