Medication Quantification Scale version III: Update in medication classes and revised detriment weights by survey of American Pain Society physicians

被引:147
作者
Harden, RN
Weinland, SR
Remble, TA
Houle, TT
Collo, S
Steedman, S
Kee, WG
机构
[1] Rehabil Inst Chicago, Ctr Pain Studies, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] S Carolina Dept Mental Hlth, G Werber Bryan Psychiat Hosp, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Med Univ S Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
medication quantification scale; outcome measures; non-malignant pain; pharmacotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.350
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) is an instrument with potential clinical and research applications for quantifying medication regimen use in chronic pain populations. The MQS was developed in 1992 and updated in 1998 (MQS 11) as a tool to co-quantify 3 relevant aspects of medications prescribed for chronic nonmalignant pain: drug class, dosage, and detriment (risk). This 2003 version (MQS 111) is the third iteration of the scale, featuring new detriment weights determined by surveying all physician members of the American Pain Society in the United States via mail. A total of 248 physicians (18%) responded with their opinion as to the detriment of 22 mechanistically distinct medication classes. Overall, the physician ratings of detriment weight were relatively consistent (a =.84). The increased number of survey responses encompassed a wide range of disciplines, thus reducing discipline bias and introducing several important changes to MQS scoring. Some medication classes previously rated with low detriment weights (eg, nonsteroicial anti-inflammatory drugs) increased in detriment weight (from 2 to 3.4), whereas other classes previously given high weights (eg, "strong" opioids) received lower detriment ratings (from 5 to 3.4) in this survey. The MQS III must now be validated in clinical and research applications. Perspective: The MQS is a tool to objectively quantify pain. It computes a single numeric value for a patient's pain medication profile. This number can be used by both clinicians and researchers to track pain levels through a treatment course or research study. (c) 2005 by the American Pain Society.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 371
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [11] Lack of adherence with the analgesic regimen: A significant barrier to effective cancer pain management
    Miaskowski, C
    Dodd, MJ
    West, C
    Paul, SM
    Tripathy, D
    Koo, P
    Schumacher, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (23) : 4275 - 4279
  • [12] Middaugh, 1998, AM J PAIN MANAGEMENT, V8, P83
  • [13] Murray L, 2004, PHYS DESK REFERENCE
  • [14] Outcome of intrathecal opioids in chronic non-cancer pain
    Roberts, LJ
    Finch, PM
    Goucke, CR
    Price, LM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN-LONDON, 2001, 5 (04): : 353 - 361
  • [15] Gabapentin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia - A randomized controlled trial
    Rowbotham, M
    Harden, N
    Stacey, B
    Bernstein, P
    Magnus-Miller, L
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (21): : 1837 - 1842
  • [16] CHRONIC-PAIN MEDICATIONS - EQUIVALENCE LEVELS AND METHOD OF QUANTIFYING USAGE
    STEEDMAN, SM
    MIDDAUGH, SJ
    KEE, WG
    CARSON, DS
    HARDEN, RN
    MILLER, MC
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1992, 8 (03) : 204 - 214
  • [17] Stormo K., 1998, CURR REV PAIN, V2, P171, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11916-998-0015-4
  • [18] WEINLAND S, 2003, J PAIN S1, V4, P9