Study of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator triggering by electronic article surveillance devices (SPICED TEAS)

被引:66
作者
McIvor, ME
Reddinger, J
Floden, E
Sheppard, RC
Johnson, D
Becker, GI
Mayotte, M
机构
[1] Heart Inst St Petersburg, Res Sect, St Petersburg, FL 33701 USA
[2] St Jude Med Inc, Cardiac Rhythm Management Div, Sylmar, CA USA
[3] Medtron Inc, Minneapolis, MN USA
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 1998年 / 21卷 / 10期
关键词
pacemakers; ICDs; environmental electromagnetic interference (EMI); electronic article surveillance systems; shoplifting gates; security systems;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00002.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The magnetic fields emitted by electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems (shoplifting gates) are a source of interference for implanted medical devices. In the Study of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Triggering by Electronic Article Surveillance Devices (SPICED TEAS), 25 adult volunteers with ICDs and 50 with pacemakers were exposed to the fields of six different EAS systems. These EAS systems used three modes of operation: magnetic audio frequency, swept radiofrequency, and acoustomagnetic technology. No ICD exhibited interference mimicking sensing of tachyarrhythmias with any EAS system. Pacemakers interacted variably, depending on the type of EAS system. Swept radiofrequency systems produced no interaction with any implanted medical device. One magnetic audio frequency system interacted with 2 of 50 pacemakers. The acoustomagnetic system interacted with 48 of 50 pacemakers. Interactions included asynchronous pacing, atrial oversensing (producing "EAS induced tachycardia" in the ventricle), ventricular oversensing (with pacemaker inhibition), and paced beats resulting from the direct induction of current in the pacemaker ("EAS induced pacing"). These interactions produced symptoms in some patients (palpitations, presyncope) only while patients were in the EAS field. No pacemaker was reprogrammed. We conclude that high energy, pulsed low frequency EAS systems such as acoustomagnetic systems interfere with most pacemakers. Pacemaker patients should be advised to minimize exposure to the fields of such systems to prevent the possibility of serious clinical events.
引用
收藏
页码:1847 / 1861
页数:15
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   ELECTRONIC ARTICLE SURVEILLANCE - A POSSIBLE DANGER FOR PACEMAKER PATIENTS [J].
DODINOT, B ;
GODENIR, JP ;
COSTA, AB ;
ZELLER, C ;
BROSCHART, M .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 16 (01) :46-53
[2]  
Furman S, 1968, Ann Thorac Surg, V6, P90
[3]   INTERFERENCE IN PACEMAKERS [J].
IRNICH, W .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 7 (06) :1021-1048
[4]   THE EFFECTS OF ELECTRONIC ARTICLE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS AN PERMANENT CARDIAC-PACEMAKERS - AN IN-VITRO STUDY [J].
LUCAS, EH ;
JOHNSON, D ;
MCELROY, BP .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 17 (11) :2021-2026
[5]   INTERFERENCE FROM A HAND-HELD RADIOFREQUENCY REMOTE-CONTROL CAUSING DISCHARGE OF AN IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATOR [J].
MAN, KC ;
DAVIDSON, T ;
LANGBERG, JJ ;
MORADY, F ;
KALBFLEISCH, SJ .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 16 (08) :1756-1758
[6]   Interaction between electronic article surveillance systems and implantable defibrillators: Insights from a fourth generation ICD [J].
Mathew, P ;
Lewis, C ;
Neglia, J ;
Krol, RB ;
Saksena, S .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (11) :2857-2859
[7]   Environmental electromagnetic interference from electronic article surveillance devices: Interactions with an ICD [J].
McIvor, ME .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 18 (12) :2229-2230
[8]  
MUGICA J, 1997, STIMUCOEUR, V25, P3
[9]  
WILKE A, 1996, HERZ SCHRITTMACHER, V16, P255
[10]  
1991, MED TRIBUNE, V40, P28