The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews

被引:405
作者
Lipsey, Mark W. [1 ]
Cullen, Francis T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Inst Publ Policy Studies, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Div Criminal Justice, Cincinnati, OH 45226 USA
关键词
treatment; deterrence; sanctions; offenders; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The effects of correctional interventions on recidivism have important public safety implications when offenders are released fro m probation or prison. Hundreds of studies have been conducted on those effects, some investigating punitive approaches and some investigating rehabilitation treatments. Systematic reviews (meta-analyses) of those studies, while varying greatly in coverage and technique, display remarkable consistency in their overall findings. Supervision and sanctions, at best, show modest mean reductions in recidivism and, in some instances, have the opposite effect and increase reoffense rates. The mean recidivism effects found in studies of rehabilitation treatment, by comparison, are consistently positive and relatively large. There is, however, considerable variability in those effects associated with the type of treatment, how well it is implemented, and the nature of the offenders to whom it is applied. The specific sources of that variability have not been well explored, but some principles for effective treatment have emerged. The rehabilitation treatments generally found effective in research do not characterize current correctional practice, and bridging the gap between research and practice remains a significant challenge.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 320
页数:24
相关论文
共 92 条
[31]   The forgotten issue in effective correctional treatment: Program implementation [J].
Gendreau, P ;
Goggin, C ;
Smith, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 1999, 43 (02) :180-187
[32]  
Gendreau P., 1996, CHOOSING CORRECTIONA
[33]  
GENDREAU P, 2006, TAKING STOCK STATUS, V15, P419
[34]  
Glaze L., 2006, PROBATION PAROLE US
[35]  
GOTTSHALK R, 1987, BEHAV APPROACHES CRI, V15, P389
[37]  
Hanson R Karl, 2002, Sex Abuse, V14, P169, DOI 10.1177/107906320201400207
[38]  
Illesca SR, 2001, PSYCHOL SPAIN, V5, P47
[39]  
Landenberger N., 2005, Journal of Experimental Criminology, V1, P451, DOI [10.1007/s11292-005-3541-7, DOI 10.1007/S11292-005-3541-7]
[40]  
Latessa EJ, 2002, FED PROBAT, V66, P43