The Social-Cognitive Underpinnings of Employees' Ambidextrous Behaviour and the Supportive Role of Group Managers' Leadership

被引:151
作者
Kauppila, Olli-Pekka
Tempelaar, Michiel P.
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Aalto, Finland
[2] Univ Amsterdam, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
individual ambidexterity; general self-efficacy; learning orientation; paradoxical leadership; social-cognitive theory; GENERAL SELF-EFFICACY; GOAL ORIENTATION; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; MEDIATING ROLE; CREATING AMBIDEXTERITY; LEARNING ORIENTATION; EXPLORATION; PERFORMANCE; EXPLOITATION; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1111/joms.12192
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although research on organizational ambidexterity has exploded in the past several years, the determinants of individual-level ambidexterity have received little scholarly attention. This is surprising given that management scholars increasingly highlight the benefits of combining explorative and exploitative activities in individual employees' work roles. Using data collected by a two-wave survey of 638 employees nested in 173 groups across 34 organizations, our research demonstrates that both psychological factors and leadership predict employees' ambidextrous behaviour. Our results demonstrate that general self-efficacy positively predicts ambidextrous behaviour through learning orientation. In addition, we show that employees exhibit higher ambidexterity when their group managers demonstrate paradoxical leadership; that is, a leadership style that couples strong managerial support with high performance expectations. Paradoxical leadership also moderates the relationship between learning orientation and individual ambidexterity such that employees' ambidextrous behaviour is highest when paradoxical leadership and employee learning orientation are simultaneously at high levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1044
页数:26
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system [J].
Adler, PS ;
Goldoftas, B ;
Levine, DI .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) :43-68
[2]   TEAMS IN PURSUIT OF RADICAL INNOVATION: A GOAL ORIENTATION PERSPECTIVE [J].
Alexander, Lameez ;
van Knippenberg, Daan .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2014, 39 (04) :423-438
[3]  
AMABILE TM, 1988, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V10, P123
[4]   When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions [J].
Ambos, Tina C. ;
Makela, Kristiina ;
Birkinshaw, Julian ;
D'Este, Pablo .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2008, 45 (08) :1424-1447
[5]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[6]   Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models [J].
Bagozzi, Richard P. ;
Yi, Youjae .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (01) :8-34
[7]   Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited [J].
Bandura, A ;
Locke, EA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (01) :87-99
[8]   SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY OF SELF-REGULATION [J].
BANDURA, A .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :248-287
[9]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[10]   State-Level Goal Orientations as Mediators of the Relationship Between Time Pressure and Performance: A Longitudinal Study [J].
Beck, James W. ;
Schmidt, Aaron M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 98 (02) :354-363