General practice care and patients' priorities in Europe: an international comparison

被引:43
作者
Wensing, M
Mainz, J
Ferreira, P
Hearnshaw, H
Hjortdahl, P
Olesen, F
Reis, S
Ribacke, M
Szecsenyi, J
Grol, R
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Qual Care Res, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Maastricht, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Aarhus Univ, Res Unit Gen Practice, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Univ Coimbra, Ctr Social Studies, Coimbra, Portugal
[5] Univ Leicester, Eli Lilly Natl Clin Audit Ctr, Leicester, Leics, England
[6] Univ Oslo, Dept Family Med, Oslo, Norway
[7] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Dept Family Hlth Care, Haifa, Israel
[8] Univ Uppsala, Dept Family Med, S-75105 Uppsala, Sweden
[9] Inst Appl Quality Improvement & Res Hlth Care, Gottingen, Germany
关键词
general practice; patient satisfaction; patient centredness; international comparison;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-8510(98)00040-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Insight into patients' priorities with respect to health care should complement the views of professionals and policy makers on what is thought to be appropriate health care. To determine the strengths and weaknesses of general practice care from patients' perspectives written surveys were performed among patients in Denmark, Germany, Israel, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden and United Kingdom (n = 3540). The potential quality problems identified were spread over the different countries: the low involvement of general practitioners in out-of-hours services in Portugal; the low provision of routine screening in Sweden, Norway and The Netherlands; the lack of a defined patient population in Germany; the lack of a formal gatekeeper role to secondary care in general practice in Germany and Sweden; and the low number of home visits in Sweden. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 186
页数:12
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1978, PRIM HLTH CAR
[2]   SATISFACTION WITH HEALTH SYSTEMS IN 10 NATIONS [J].
BLENDON, RJ ;
LEITMAN, R ;
MORRISON, I ;
DONELAN, K .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1990, 9 (02) :185-192
[3]  
Boerma WGW, 1997, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V47, P481
[4]  
BOERMA WGW, 1994, HUISARTS WETENSCHAP, V37, P546
[5]   MAJOR DETERMINANTS OF CONSUMER SATISFACTION WITH PRIMARY-CARE IN DIFFERENT HEALTH SYSTEMS [J].
CALNAN, M ;
KATSOUYIANNOPOULOS, V ;
OVCHAROV, VK ;
PROKHORSKAS, R ;
RAMIC, H ;
WILLIAMS, S .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1994, 11 (04) :468-478
[6]   GATEKEEPING REVISITED - PROTECTING PATIENTS FROM OVERTREATMENT [J].
FRANKS, P ;
CLANCY, CM ;
NUTTING, PA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (06) :424-429
[7]   What future for continuity of care in general practice? [J].
Freeman, G ;
Hjortdahl, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7098) :1870-1873
[8]   PRIMARY-CARE, FINANCING AND GATEKEEPING IN WESTERN-EUROPE [J].
GERVAS, J ;
FERNANDEZ, MP ;
STARFIELD, BH .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1994, 11 (03) :307-317
[9]  
*OECD, 1993, OECD HLTH SYST FACTS
[10]   OUT-OF-HOURS SERVICE - THE DANISH SOLUTION EXAMINED [J].
OLESEN, F ;
JOLLEYS, JV .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6969) :1624-1626