Functional magnetic resonance imaging examination of two modular architectures for switching multiple internal models

被引:93
作者
Imamizu, H
Kuroda, T
Yoshioka, T
Kawato, M
机构
[1] Adv Telecommun Res Inst, Computat Neurosci Labs, Kyoto 6190288, Japan
[2] Japan Sci & Technol Corp, Exploratory Res Adv Technol Kawato Dynam Brain Pr, Kyoto 6190288, Japan
关键词
task switching; internal model; computational models; functional magnetic resonance imaging; tool use; cerebro-cerebellar communication loop;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4011-03.2004
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
An internal model is a neural mechanism that can mimic the input-output properties of a controlled object such as a tool. Recent research interests have moved on to how multiple internal models are learned and switched under a given context of behavior. Two representative computational models for task switching propose distinct neural mechanisms, thus predicting different brain activity patterns in the switching of internal models. In one model, called the mixture-of-experts architecture, switching is commanded by a single executive called a "gating network," which is different from the internal models. In the other model, called the MOSAIC (MOdular Selection And Identification for Control), the internal models themselves play crucial roles in switching. Consequently, the mixture-of-experts model predicts that neural activities related to switching and internal models can be temporally and spatially segregated, whereas the MOSAIC model predicts that they are closely intermingled. Here, we directly examined the two predictions by analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging activities during the switching of one common tool (an ordinary computer mouse) and two novel tools: a rotated mouse, the cursor of which appears in a rotated position, and a velocity mouse, the cursor velocity of which is proportional to the mouse position. The switching and internal model activities temporally and spatially overlapped each other in the cerebellum and in the parietal cortex, whereas the overlap was very small in the frontal cortex. These results suggest that switching mechanisms in the frontal cortex can be explained by the mixture-of-experts architecture, whereas those in the cerebellum and the parietal cortex are explained by the MOSAIC model.
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / 1181
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]  
Kawato M, 1998, NOVART FDN SYMP, V218, P291
[22]  
Kelly RM, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P8432
[23]   Transient activation of inferior prefrontal cortex during cognitive set shifting [J].
Konishi, S ;
Nakajima, K ;
Uchida, I ;
Kameyama, M ;
Nakahara, K ;
Sekihara, K ;
Miyashita, Y .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 1 (01) :80-84
[24]   IS THE CEREBELLUM A SMITH PREDICTOR [J].
MIALL, RC ;
WEIR, DJ ;
WOLPERT, DM ;
STEIN, JF .
JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 1993, 25 (03) :203-216
[25]   The cerebellum coordinates eye and hand tracking movements [J].
Miall, RC ;
Reckess, GZ ;
Imamizu, H .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 4 (06) :638-644
[26]   ANATOMICAL EVIDENCE FOR CEREBELLAR AND BASAL GANGLIA INVOLVEMENT IN HIGHER COGNITIVE FUNCTION [J].
MIDDLETON, FA ;
STRICK, PL .
SCIENCE, 1994, 266 (5184) :458-461
[27]   Cerebellar projections to the prefrontal cortex of the primate [J].
Middleton, FA ;
Strick, PL .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 21 (02) :700-712
[28]   Functional MRI of macaque monkeys performing a cognitive set-shifting task [J].
Nakahara, K ;
Hayashi, T ;
Konishi, S ;
Miyashita, Y .
SCIENCE, 2002, 295 (5559) :1532-1536
[29]   THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS: THE EDINBURGH INVENTORY [J].
OLDFIELD, RC .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1971, 9 (01) :97-113
[30]   Working memory for location and time: Activity in prefrontal area 46 relates to selection rather than maintenance in memory [J].
Rowe, JB ;
Passingham, RE .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (01) :77-86