The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research

被引:747
作者
Behrend, Tara S. [1 ]
Sharek, David J. [2 ]
Meade, Adam W. [2 ]
Wiebe, Eric N. [2 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Crowdsourcing; Mechanical Turk; Industrial/organizational psychology; Survey research; Sampling; Personality; PAPER-AND-PENCIL; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH; INTERNET; COMPUTER; ONLINE; QUESTIONNAIRES; PERSONALITY; TESTS;
D O I
10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Online contract labor portals (i.e., crowdsourcing) have recently emerged as attractive alternatives to university participant pools for the purposes of collecting survey data for behavioral research. However, prior research has not provided a thorough examination of crowdsourced data for organizational psychology research. We found that, as compared with a traditional university participant pool, crowdsourcing respondents were older, were more ethnically diverse, and had more work experience. Additionally, the reliability of the data from the crowdsourcing sample was as good as or better than the corresponding university sample. Moreover, measurement invariance generally held across these groups. We conclude that the use of these labor portals is an efficient and appropriate alternative to a university participant pool, despite small differences in personality and socially desirable responding across the samples. The risks and advantages of crowdsourcing are outlined, and an overview of practical and ethical guidelines is provided.
引用
收藏
页码:800 / 813
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [21] Howe J., 2006, Wired Mag, V6, P1
  • [22] Ipeirotis P., 2010, CTR DIGITAL EC RES W, V10
  • [23] Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventories
    Johnson, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2005, 39 (01) : 103 - 129
  • [24] Kittur A, 2008, CHI 2008: 26TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS VOLS 1 AND 2, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, P453
  • [25] Kleemann F., 2008, Science, Technology Innovation Studies, V4, P5, DOI [http://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-12790, DOI 10.17877/DE290R-12790]
  • [26] Psychological research online - Report of board of scientific affairs' advisory group on the conduct of research on the Internet
    Kraut, R
    Olson, J
    Banaji, M
    Bruckman, A
    Cohen, J
    Couper, M
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2004, 59 (02) : 105 - 117
  • [27] Stereotypes, Bias, and Personnel Decisions: Strange and Stranger
    Landy, Frank J.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2008, 1 (04): : 379 - 392
  • [28] AlphaTest: A windows program for tests of hypotheses about coefficient alpha
    Lautenschlager, Gary J.
    Meade, Adam W.
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2008, 32 (06) : 502 - 503
  • [29] TurKit: Tools for Iterative Tasks on Mechanical Turk
    Little, Greg
    [J]. 2009 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON VISUAL LANGUAGES AND HUMAN-CENTRIC COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 252 - 253
  • [30] Locke E.A., 1986, Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings: Research Findings from Industrial-Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, and Human Resource Management