Brief Motivational Interventions for College Student Drinking May Not Be as Powerful as We Think: An Individual Participant-Level Data Meta-Analysis

被引:113
作者
Huh, David [1 ]
Mun, Eun-Young [2 ]
Larimer, Mary E. [1 ]
White, Helene R. [2 ]
Ray, Anne E. [2 ]
Rhew, Isaac C. [1 ]
Kim, Su-Young [3 ]
Jiao, Yang [2 ]
Atkins, David C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Alcohol Studies, Piscataway, NJ USA
[3] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Psychol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
ALCOHOL-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH | 2015年 / 39卷 / 05期
关键词
Integrative Data Analysis; Meta-Analysis; Brief Motivational Interventions; College Drinking; Bayesian Multilevel Models; BRIEF ALCOHOL INTERVENTION; SUBSTANCE USE INTERVENTIONS; HEAVY-DRINKING; PERSONALIZED FEEDBACK; FOLLOW-UP; PREVENTION; DRINKERS; EFFICACY; CONSEQUENCES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/acer.12714
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundFor over 2 decades, brief motivational interventions (BMIs) have been implemented on college campuses to reduce heavy drinking and related negative consequences. Such interventions include in-person motivational interviews (MIs), often incorporating personalized feedback (PF), and stand-alone PF interventions delivered via mail, computer, or the Web. Both narrative and meta-analytic reviews using aggregate data from published studies suggest at least short-term efficacy of BMIs, although overall effect sizes have been small. MethodsThis study was an individual participant-level data (IPD) meta-analysis of 17 randomized clinical trials evaluating BMIs. Unlike typical meta-analysis based on summary data, IPD meta-analysis allows for an analysis that correctly accommodates the sampling, sample characteristics, and distributions of the pooled data. In particular, highly skewed distributions with many zeroes are typical for drinking outcomes, but have not been adequately accounted for in existing studies. Data are from Project INTEGRATE, one of the largest IPD meta-analysis projects to date in alcohol intervention research, representing 6,713 individuals each with 2 to 5 repeated measures up to 12months postbaseline. ResultsWe used Bayesian multilevel over dispersed Poisson hurdle models to estimate intervention effects on drinks per week and peak drinking, and Gaussian models for alcohol problems. Estimates of overall intervention effects were very small and not statistically significant for any of the outcomes. We further conducted post hoc comparisons of 3 intervention types (individual MI with PF, PF only, and group MI) versus control. There was a small, statistically significant reduction in alcohol problems among participants who received an individual MI with PF. Short-term and long-term results were similar. ConclusionsThis study questions the efficacy and magnitude of effects of BMIs for college drinking prevention and intervention and suggests a need for the development of more effective intervention strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 931
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice [J].
Simmonds, MC ;
Higgins, JPT ;
Stewart, LA ;
Tierney, JF ;
Clarke, MJ ;
Thompson, SG .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 2 (03) :209-217
[42]   A Retrospective Analysis of Dissemination Biases in the Brief Alcohol Intervention Literature [J].
Tanner-Smith, Emily E. ;
Polanin, Joshua R. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2015, 29 (01) :49-62
[43]   Questions and reflections: The use of motivational interviewing microskills in a peer-led Brief Alcohol Intervention for College Students [J].
Tollison, Sean J. ;
Lee, Christine M. ;
Neighbors, Clayton ;
Neil, Teryl A. ;
Olson, Nichole D. ;
Larimer, Mary E. .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2008, 39 (02) :183-194
[44]   A controlled trial of web-based feedback for heavy drinking college students [J].
Walters, Scott T. ;
Vader, Amanda M. ;
Harris, T. Robert .
PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2007, 8 (01) :83-88
[45]   Dismantling Motivational Interviewing and Feedback for College Drinkers: A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Walters, Scott T. ;
Vader, Amanda M. ;
Harris, T. Robert ;
Field, Craig A. ;
Jouriles, Ernest N. .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 77 (01) :64-73
[46]   Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: What, why and for whom? [J].
Walters, ST ;
Neighbors, C .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2005, 30 (06) :1168-1182
[47]   Long-term effects of brief substance use interventions for mandated college students: Sleeper effects of an in-person personal feedback intervention [J].
White, Helene R. ;
Mun, Eun Young ;
Pugh, Lisa ;
Morgan, Thomas J. .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2007, 31 (08) :1380-1391
[48]   Do brief personalized feedback interventions work for mandated students or is it just getting caught that works? [J].
White, Helene Raskin ;
Mun, Eun Young ;
Morgan, Thomas J. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2008, 22 (01) :107-116
[49]   Brief motivational intervention and alcohol expectancy challenge with heavy drinking college students: A randomized factorial study [J].
Wood, Mark D. ;
Capone, Christy ;
Laforge, Robert ;
Erickson, Darin J. ;
Brand, Nancy H. .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2007, 32 (11) :2509-2528
[50]   Brief Motivational and Parent Interventions for College Students: A Randomized Factorial Study [J].
Wood, Mark D. ;
Fairlie, Anne M. ;
Fernandez, Anne C. ;
Borsari, Brian ;
Capone, Christy ;
Laforge, Robert ;
Carmona-Barros, Rosa .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 78 (03) :349-361