Learning to avoid aposematic prey

被引:33
作者
Lynn, SK [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Tucson, AZ USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.03.010
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The evolution of prey warning coloration is, literally, a textbook example of Darwinian adaptive evolution by natural selection. The cornerstone of this evolutionary process is a predation event, the dynamics of which are poorly understood. Aposematic (warningly coloured) prey. are relatively unpalatable and their conspicuous appearance should enable predators to avoid them, but such is not always the case. Based on models of conditioned learning, it has been assumed that the number of aposematic prey that a predator will attack as it learns to avoid such prey should be constant or declining as the prey's abundance increases. However, empirical studies have shown that predators make more attacks on aposematic prey when those prey are more common. I suggest that this failure of theory to predict behaviour probably arises from limitations of the learning models in question. Rather than using mechanistic models of conditioned learning, I used signal detection theory to provide a functional characterization of the uncertainty that inexperienced predators encounter when learning to distinguish prey types. This characterization explains otherwise puzzling data on predation on aposematic prey and can offer insight on the selective pressures driving the evolution of aposematism and mimicry. (c) 2005 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1221 / 1226
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]   The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense [J].
Sherratt, TN ;
Beatty, CD .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2003, 162 (04) :377-389
[32]   The evolution of female-limited polymorphisms in damselflies: a signal detection model [J].
Sherratt, TN .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2001, 4 (01) :22-29
[33]   Can receiver psychology explain the evolution of aposematism? [J].
Speed, MP .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2001, 61 :205-216
[34]   MUELLERIAN MIMICRY AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PREDATION [J].
SPEED, MP .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1993, 45 (03) :571-580
[35]   Testing Mullerian mimicry: an experiment with wild birds [J].
Speed, MP ;
Alderson, NJ ;
Hardman, C ;
Ruxton, GD .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 267 (1444) :725-731
[36]   Batesian, quasi-Batesian or Mullerian mimicry? Theory and data in mimicry Research [J].
Speed, MP .
EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 1999, 13 (7-8) :755-776
[37]   Learning and memory in mimicry: II. Do we understand the mimicry spectrum? [J].
Speed, MP ;
Turner, JRG .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1999, 67 (03) :281-312
[38]  
Sperling G., 1984, VARIETIES ATTENTION, P103
[39]   OPTIMAL DETECTION OF CRYPTIC PREY MAY LEAD TO PREDATOR SWITCHING [J].
STADDON, JER ;
GENDRON, RP .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1983, 122 (06) :843-848
[40]   Density-dependent warning coloration [J].
Sword, GA .
NATURE, 1999, 397 (6716) :217-217