Multi-criteria analysis for the selection of space heating systems in an industrial building

被引:62
作者
Chinese, Damiana [1 ]
Nardin, Gioacchino [1 ]
Saro, Onorio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Udine, DiEM Dept Energy Technol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
关键词
Industrial space heating systems; Analytic Hierarchy Process; Energy system choices; Energy management; OFFICE BUILDINGS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; CRITERIA ANALYSIS; THERMAL COMFORT; OPTIMIZATION; RELIABILITY; DESIGN; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.005
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Decisions on space heating of industrial buildings involve several conflicting objectives and solutions prospected by economic optimization (e.g. life cycle cost minimization) models may be far from the real preferences of decision makers. To overcome this limit, multi-criteria decision analysis which has hardly been used at single building level, especially in industrial contexts, could be a helpful methodology. This paper presents the application of a well-known multi-criteria approach, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), to the selection of space heating systems for an industrial building. We discuss the technologies available for industrial heating, criteria elicited from the decision maker and the ranking of alternatives identified with our AHP model. As very little is reported in literature about industrial energy system choices, our study, although focused on an individual case, may shed some light on decision making in this sector. To this end, we also compare our results with evidence on residential heating systems choices derived from literature. Investment costs are the most important criterion for industry, whereas qualitative attributes and operational costs are most important for homes. Qualitative attributes also significantly affect industrial heating system choices and, as the AHP is particularly effective in handling these aspects, we suggest it could be used for tactical energy planning models. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 565
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Multi-criteria evaluation of residential energy supply systems [J].
Alanne, Kari ;
Salo, Ahti ;
Saari, Arto ;
Gustafsson, Stig-Inge .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2007, 39 (12) :1218-1226
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, FUNDAMENTALS DECISIO
[3]  
Bejan A, 1996, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM
[4]   LINEAR-PROGRAMMING APPLIED TO AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING WITH SEVERAL AVAILABLE HOT REFUSE FLOWS [J].
BOJIC, M ;
LUKIC, N ;
TRNOBRANSKY, K .
ENERGY, 1995, 20 (10) :1067-1074
[5]   Modelling the adoption of industrial cogeneration in Japan using manufacturing plant survey data [J].
Bonilla, D ;
Akisawa, A ;
Kashiwagi, T .
ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (09) :895-910
[6]   Multi Criteria Analysis for bioenergy systems assessments [J].
Buchholz, Thomas ;
Rametsteiner, Ewald ;
Volk, Timothy A. ;
Luzadis, Valerie A. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (02) :484-495
[7]   Optimisation models for decision support in the development of biomass-based industrial district-heating networks in Italy [J].
Chinese, D ;
Meneghetti, A .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2005, 82 (03) :228-254
[8]   Towards a multi-objective optimization approach for improving energy efficiency in buildings [J].
Diakaki, Christina ;
Grigoroudis, Evangelos ;
Kolokotsa, Dionyssia .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2008, 40 (09) :1747-1754
[9]   Optimisation of insulation measures on existing buildings [J].
Gustafsson, SI .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2000, 33 (01) :49-55
[10]   Minimisation of life cycle cost of a detached house using combined simulation and optimisation [J].
Hasan, Ala ;
Vuolle, Mika ;
Siren, Kai .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 43 (12) :2022-2034