Field comparison of novel and gold,standard traps for collecting Aedes albopictus in Northern Virginia

被引:97
作者
Meeraus, Wilhelmine H. [1 ]
Armistead, Jennifer S. [1 ]
Arias, Jorge R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fairfax Cty Hlth Dept, Dis Carrying Insects Program, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention miniature light trap; BG-Sentinel (TM); CMT-20 (TM) (Zumba (TM)); Aedes albopictus; adult mosquito surveillance;
D O I
10.2987/5676.1
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aedes albopictus is a potential West Nile virus bridge vector in Northern Virginia; however, information regarding its virus transmission dynamics is limited, as this species is not readily collected in existing traps. This study used 5 replicates of a 5 x 5 Latin square to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of 2 novel host-seeking mosquito traps (the BG-Sentinel (TM) and the Collapsible Mosquito Trap (CMT-20 (TM)) in collecting Ae. albopictus, relative to a carbon dioxide (CO2)-baited Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) miniature light trap. When used with CO2, the BG-Sentinel (with BG-Lure) collected 33 times more female Ae. albopictus per 24-h trapping period than did the CO2-baited CDC light trap. Without CO2, the BG-Sentinel (with BG-Lure) still collected over 6 times as many female Ae. albopictus as the CO2-baited CDC trap. Both configurations of the BG-Sentinel were significantly more effective than the other traps. The BG-Sentinel was also significantly more efficient in collecting Ae. albopictus and collected a high proportion of this species, both with CO2 and without CO2. The CMT-20 (with Skin Lure (TM)) collected significantly more Ae. albopictus when used with CO2 than without CO2, but did not collect significantly more Ae. albopictus than the CO2-baited CDC light trap. The proportion of Ae. albopictus collected in the CMT-20 with CO2 and without CO2 did not differ significantly from the proportion of Ae. albopictus collected in the CDC trap.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 248
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]  
Riffenburgh RH, 2006, STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2ND EDITION, P1
[12]  
Ritchie SA, 2006, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V22, P358, DOI 10.2987/8756-971X(2006)22[358:DOAWIO]2.0.CO
[13]  
2
[14]  
Rose Andreas, 2006, Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fuer Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie, V15, P345
[15]  
Sardelis MR, 2002, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V18, P284
[16]  
Turell MJ, 2005, J MED ENTOMOL, V42, P57, DOI 10.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[0057:AUOTPO]2.0.CO
[17]  
2
[18]  
Williams CR, 2007, J MED ENTOMOL, V44, P345, DOI 10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[345:AAPSUB]2.0.CO
[19]  
2
[20]  
Williams CR, 2006, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V22, P296, DOI 10.2987/8756-971X(2006)22[296:FEOTBC]2.0.CO