Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change

被引:239
作者
Mintrom, M [1 ]
Vergari, S [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV NO IOWA,DEPT POLIT SCI,CEDAR FALLS,IA 50614
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0072.1996.tb01638.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The advocacy coalition framework (AC) explains policy stability. The policy entrepreneurship model (PE) explains dynamic policy change. Thus, augmenting the AC with insights from the PE provides a method of explaining a common empirical phenomenon: policy stability punctuated by dynamic policy change. This analytical strategy could be used to explore stability and change in many policy arenas. Here, we use it to interpret the background to and dynamics of recent education policy reform in Michigan.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 434
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   REGULATING LOBBYISTS AND INTEREST GROUP INFLUENCE [J].
AINSWORTH, S .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1993, 55 (01) :41-56
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, POLITICS REGULATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], NEW STRATEGIC PERSPE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, POLICY CHANGE LEARNI
[5]   COUNTERACTIVE LOBBYING [J].
AUSTENSMITH, D ;
WRIGHT, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1994, 38 (01) :25-44
[6]  
Baumgartner F.R., 1993, Agendas and Instability in American Politics
[7]  
Cobb R.W., 1983, Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building
[8]  
CONLAN TJ, 1995, NEW POLITICS PUBLIC, P121
[9]  
Dahl R.A., 1961, WHO GOVERNS
[10]  
Derthick Martha., 1985, POLITICS DEREGULATIO