Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change

被引：239

作者：

Mintrom, M ^{[1
]}

Vergari, S ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV NO IOWA,DEPT POLIT SCI,CEDAR FALLS,IA 50614

来源：

POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL | 1996年 / 24卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1541-0072.1996.tb01638.x

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

The advocacy coalition framework (AC) explains policy stability. The policy entrepreneurship model (PE) explains dynamic policy change. Thus, augmenting the AC with insights from the PE provides a method of explaining a common empirical phenomenon: policy stability punctuated by dynamic policy change. This analytical strategy could be used to explore stability and change in many policy arenas. Here, we use it to interpret the background to and dynamics of recent education policy reform in Michigan.

引用

页码：420 / 434

页数：15

共 44 条

[21] THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH [J].

LINDBLOM, CE .

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1959, 19 (02) :79-88

[22] WHEN SOCIAL-PROBLEMS ARE TREATED AS EMERGENCIES [J].

LIPSKY, M ;

SMITH, SR .

SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 1989, 63 (01) :5-25

[23]

Lowi T., 1969, END LIBERALISM

[24]

MAJONE G, 1988, POWER PUBLIC IDEAS, P157

[25]

*MI DEP ED, 1993, BULL MICH DEP ED, V1014

[26]

MINTROM M, 1993, POLIT RES QUART, V46, P847

[27]

MINTROM M, IN PRESS STATE LOCAL

[28]

MINTROM M, IN PRESS AM J POLITI, V41

[29]

MINTROM M, 1994, THESIS STATE U NEW Y

[30]

Polsby NW., 1984, POLITICAL INNOVATION, DOI 10.2307/j.ctt1xp3v5s

← 1 2 3 4 5 →