Time-dependent rates of molecular evolution

被引:420
作者
Ho, Simon Y. W. [1 ,2 ]
Lanfear, Robert [1 ]
Bromham, Lindell [1 ]
Phillips, Matthew J. [1 ]
Soubrier, Julien [3 ]
Rodrigo, Allen G. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Cooper, Alan [3 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Biol, Ctr Macroevolut & Macroecol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Biol Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Australian Ctr Ancient DNA, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Biol, Durham, NC USA
[5] Univ Auckland, Bioinformat Inst, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[6] Univ Auckland, Sch Biol Sci, Auckland 1, New Zealand
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
calibrations; divergence times; molecular clock; mutation rate; purifying selection; substitution rate; HUMAN MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA; STRONG PURIFYING SELECTION; MUTATION-RATE; ANCIENT DNA; BAYESIAN-ESTIMATION; PHYLOGENETIC ESTIMATION; POPULATION-DIVERGENCE; PATERNAL INHERITANCE; SUBSTITUTION RATES; NATURAL-SELECTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05178.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
For over half a century, it has been known that the rate of morphological evolution appears to vary with the time frame of measurement. Rates of microevolutionary change, measured between successive generations, were found to be far higher than rates of macroevolutionary change inferred from the fossil record. More recently, it has been suggested that rates of molecular evolution are also time dependent, with the estimated rate depending on the timescale of measurement. This followed surprising observations that estimates of mutation rates, obtained in studies of pedigrees and laboratory mutation-accumulation lines, exceeded long-term substitution rates by an order of magnitude or more. Although a range of studies have provided evidence for such a pattern, the hypothesis remains relatively contentious. Furthermore, there is ongoing discussion about the factors that can cause molecular rate estimates to be dependent on time. Here we present an overview of our current understanding of time-dependent rates. We provide a summary of the evidence for time-dependent rates in animals, bacteria and viruses. We review the various biological and methodological factors that can cause rates to be time dependent, including the effects of natural selection, calibration errors, model misspecification and other artefacts. We also describe the challenges in calibrating estimates of molecular rates, particularly on the intermediate timescales that are critical for an accurate characterization of time-dependent rates. This has important consequences for the use of molecular-clock methods to estimate timescales of recent evolutionary events.
引用
收藏
页码:3087 / 3101
页数:15
相关论文
共 144 条
[61]   Accounting for Calibration Uncertainty in Phylogenetic Estimation of Evolutionary Divergence Times [J].
Ho, Simon Y. W. ;
Phillips, Matthew J. .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2009, 58 (03) :367-380
[62]   Molecular clocks: when times are a-changin' [J].
Ho, SYW ;
Larson, G .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2006, 22 (02) :79-83
[63]   Time dependency of molecular rate estimates and systematic overestimation of recent divergence times [J].
Ho, SYW ;
Phillips, MJ ;
Cooper, A ;
Drummond, AJ .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2005, 22 (07) :1561-1568
[64]  
Holmes E.C., 2009, OXFORD SERIES ECOLOG
[65]   Patterns of intra- and interhost nonsynonymous variation reveal strong purifying selection in dengue virus [J].
Holmes, EC .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 2003, 77 (20) :11296-11298
[66]   Mutation accumulation and the effect of copia insertions in Drosophila melanogaster [J].
Houle, D ;
Nuzhdin, SV .
GENETICS RESEARCH, 2004, 83 (01) :7-18
[67]   Time dependency of molecular rate estimates for mtDNA: this is not the time for wishful thinking [J].
Howell, N. ;
Howell, C. ;
Elson, J. L. .
HEREDITY, 2008, 101 (02) :107-108
[68]  
Howell N, 1997, AM J HUM GENET, V61, P986
[69]  
Howell N, 1996, AM J HUM GENET, V59, P501
[70]   The pedigree rate of sequence divergence in the human mitochondrial genome: There is a difference between phylogenetic and pedigree rates [J].
Howell, N ;
Smejkal, CB ;
Mackey, DA ;
Chinnery, PF ;
Turnbull, DM ;
Herrnstadt, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (03) :659-670