Species richness, rarity and endemicity of European mammals:: a biogeographical approach

被引:60
作者
Baquero, RA
Tellería, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Ciencias Biol, Dept Biol Anim 1, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] CSIC, Museo Nacl Ciencias Nat, Estac Biogeol El Ventorrillo, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
关键词
conservation; endemicity; European mammals; geographical distribution; rarity; species richness;
D O I
10.1023/A:1016698921404
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the distribution of species richness, rarity and endemicity of European land mammals (bats and introduced species excluded). The highest level of species richness was in Central Europe, while Southern areas had the highest rarity and endemicity scores. The distribution of richness was affected by the location of sampling points in islands and peninsulas. After excluding these sampling points, richness continued to decrease Westward suggesting the existence of a large-scale peninsular effect on mammal distribution. These patterns of continental distribution of richness, rarity and endemicity could be the result of the distribution of refuge areas in the southern Mediterranean peninsulas, and the Pleistocene advances and retreats of mammals throughout the Western Palearctic. Thus, European mammal distribution can be interpreted on the basis of two different patterns of abundance distribution in which Palearctic species reduce their abundance from central-Europe outwards, while endemic, rare species show a similar depletion in the North. It should be useful to evaluate the role of the different regions in Europe in conserving the demographic interactions between central and peripheral populations of mammal species. Given the restricted distribution and potential small size of population, these endemic species are most likely to be susceptible to anthropogenic environmental degradation.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 44
页数:16
相关论文
共 73 条
[31]   Species-range-size distributions: Patterns, mechanisms and implications [J].
Gaston, KJ .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1996, 11 (05) :197-201
[32]  
Greuter W., 1991, BOT CHRON, V10, P63
[33]   DYNAMICS OF REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION - THE CORE AND SATELLITE SPECIES HYPOTHESIS [J].
HANSKI, I .
OIKOS, 1982, 38 (02) :210-221
[34]   SINGLE-SPECIES METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS - CONCEPTS, MODELS AND OBSERVATIONS [J].
HANSKI, I .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1991, 42 (1-2) :17-38
[35]   Phylogeny and species limits in the Palaearctic chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita complex: Mitochondrial genetic differentiation and bioacoustic evidence [J].
Helbig, AJ ;
Martens, J ;
Seibold, I ;
Henning, F ;
Schottler, B ;
Wink, M .
IBIS, 1996, 138 (04) :650-666
[36]   THE DISTRIBUTION OF ABUNDANCE .1. MEASUREMENTS [J].
HENGEVELD, R ;
HAECK, J .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 1982, 9 (04) :303-316
[37]  
Heptner VG., 1992, MAMMALS SOVIET UNI 2, VII
[38]  
Hewitt GM, 1996, BIOL J LINN SOC, V58, P247, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01434.x
[39]   How does immigration influence local adaptation? A reexamination of a familiar paradigm [J].
Holt, RD ;
Gomulkiewicz, R .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1997, 149 (03) :563-572
[40]   SPECIES-RICHNESS IN NORTH-TEMPERATE ZONE FORESTS [J].
HUNTLEY, B .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 1993, 20 (02) :163-180