Measuring and implementing equality of opportunity for income

被引:30
作者
Peragine, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bari, Fac Econ, Dipartimento Sci Econ, I-70124 Bari, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00355-003-0282-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Departing from the welfarist tradition, recent theories of justice focus on individual opportunities as the appropriate standard for distributive judgments. To explore how this philosophical conception can be translated into concrete public policy, we select the income as relevant outcome and the income tax as the relevant redistributive policy, and we address the following questions: (i) what is the degree of opportunity inequality in an income distribution? (ii) how to design an opportunity egalitarian income tax policy? Several criteria for ranking income distributions on the basis of equality of opportunities are derived. Moreover, we characterize an opportunity egalitarian income tax and we formulate criteria for choosing among alternative tax schedules.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 210
页数:24
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ALERGI R, 1999, LOGIC GAME THEORY SO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, MODERN THEORIES JUST
[3]  
[Anonymous], J EC SURV
[4]   EQUALITY AND EQUAL-OPPORTUNITY FOR WELFARE [J].
ARNESON, RJ .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 1989, 56 (01) :77-93
[5]  
ATKINSON AB, 1987, ARROW FDN THEORY EC
[6]  
BARBERA S, HDB UTILITY THEORY, V2
[7]   REDISTRIBUTION MECHANISMS BASED ON INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS [J].
BOSSERT, W .
MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1995, 29 (01) :1-17
[8]   ON THE CURRENCY OF EGALITARIAN JUSTICE [J].
COHEN, GA .
ETHICS, 1989, 99 (04) :906-944
[9]  
DWORKIN R, 1981, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V10, P283
[10]   ON FAIR COMPENSATION [J].
FLEURBAEY, M .
THEORY AND DECISION, 1994, 36 (03) :277-307