Partnerships in the provision of services by multi-agencies: four dimensions of service leadership and service quality

被引:8
作者
Armistead, Colin [1 ]
Pettigrew, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Ctr Org Effectiveness, Sch Business, Bournemouth BH1 3LG, Dorset, England
关键词
Partnerships; Public services; Trust; Contract;
D O I
10.1007/s11628-006-0017-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the relationship between four key dimensions of service provision through adopting different partnership approaches. These dimensions are identified to describe partnerships as mandatory or voluntary and service provision based on contract or trust. Propositions about the nature and interaction of these variables are presented and combined as a heuristic suggesting complying, constraining and creating modes of partnership-working and service delivery. Examples are provided of these modes in practice. The paper concludes that this heuristic is a useful tool for practitioners to locate their form of partnership-based service delivery within the spectrum identified.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 32
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COLLABORATING CHANGE
[2]  
Armistead C., 2004, INT J PUBLIC SECT MA, V17, P571, DOI [10.1108/09513550410562257, DOI 10.1108/09513550410562257]
[3]  
Axelrod R., 1984, The evolution of cooperation
[4]  
Bouckaert G., 2002, PUBLIC PERFORM MANAG, V25, P359, DOI DOI 10.2307/3381129
[5]   The evaluation of public service inspection: A theoretical framework [J].
Boyne, G ;
Day, P ;
Walker, R .
URBAN STUDIES, 2002, 39 (07) :1197-1212
[6]  
Child J., 1998, STRATEGIES COOPERATI
[7]  
CLARKE M, 1997, PARTNERSHIP MANAGEME
[8]  
Coulson A., 1998, TRUST CONTRACTS RELA
[9]  
Dent S. M., 1999, Partnering Intelligence: How to Profit from Smart Alliances
[10]   The iron cage revisited - Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Reprinted from the American Sociological Association vol 48, pg 147-160, 1983) [J].
DiMaggio, PJ ;
Powell, WW .
ADVANCES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, VOL 17, 2000: ECONOMICS MEETS SOCIOLOGY IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2000, 17 :143-166