Changes in population attitudes about where smoking should not be allowed: California versus the rest of the USA

被引:82
作者
Gilpin, EA [1 ]
Lee, L [1 ]
Pierce, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Ctr Canc, Canc Prevent & Control Program, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1136/tc.2003.004739
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The decade long California Tobacco Control Program is unique to the nation in its duration, emphasis, and level of funding. Programme emphasis is on changing social norms about smoking as a means to discourage smoking and thus reduce the harmful health effects of tobacco to the population. Methods: Data from the 1992 - 93, 1995 - 96, and 1998 - 99 Tobacco Use Supplements to the national Current Population Survey (n> 175 000 each period) were used to examine changes in norms regarding where smoking should "not be allowed at all'' in both California and in the rest of the USA. Venues queried were restaurants, hospitals, work areas, bars, indoor sports venues, and indoor shopping malls. Results: There were substantial increases in the percentages of the adult population (18+ years) stating that smoking should not be allowed in the venues queried in California by 1998 - 99 compared to 1992 - 93; only modest increases were observed in the rest of the USA. In fact, for most venues, the percentages for the rest of the USA were lower in 1998 - 99 than in California in 1992 - 93. Further, the percentage increase over this period in respondents stating that smoking should not be allowed in four or more of the six venues was 30% in California and 23% in the rest of the USA. The most dramatic percentage increase in California occurred among current smokers (93%). Conclusions: A strong, comprehensive tobacco control programme such as California's can influence population norms, including those of smokers, with respect to where smoking should not be allowed.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 44
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, The California tobacco control program: A decade of progress, results from the California tobacco surveys, 1990-1999
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
*CALEPA, 1997, HLTH EFF EXP ENV TOB
[4]   Clean indoor air: Advances in California, 1990-1999 [J].
Gilpin, EA ;
Farkas, AJ ;
Emery, SL ;
Ake, CF ;
Pierce, JP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 92 (05) :785-791
[5]  
HANSEN RH, 1985, 40 US DEP COMM BUR C
[6]  
*NAT CANC I, 1999, SMOK TOB CONTR MON N, V10
[7]   LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS OF MASS-MEDIA LED ANTISMOKING CAMPAIGNS IN AUSTRALIA [J].
PIERCE, JP ;
MACASKILL, P ;
HILL, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1990, 80 (05) :565-569
[8]   Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry [J].
Scollo, M ;
Lal, A ;
Hyland, A ;
Glantz, S .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2003, 12 (01) :13-20
[9]  
*TOB ED RES OV COM, 2000, TOB FREE CAL STRAT 2
[10]  
*US DEP COMM, 2000, 63 US DEP COMM BUR C