Recognition and binding of mismatch repair proteins at an oncogenic hot spot

被引:9
作者
Edelbrock, M
He, HL
Schroering, A
Fernstrom, M
Bathala, S
Williams, KJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Ohio, Dept Biochem & Canc Biol, Toledo, OH 43699 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Div Human Canc Genet, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ S Alabama, Dept Cell Biol & Neurosci, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
来源
BMC MOLECULAR BIOLOGY | 2005年 / 6卷
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2199-6-6
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: The current investigation was undertaken to determine key steps differentiating G: T and G: A repair at the H-ras oncogenic hot spot within the nuclear environment because of the large difference in repair efficiency of these two mismatches. Results: Electrophoretic mobility shift ( gel shift) experiments demonstrate that DNA containing mismatched bases are recognized and bound equally efficiently by hMutS alpha in both MMR proficient and MMR deficient ( hMLHI-/-) nuclear extracts. Competition experiments demonstrate that while hMutSa predictably binds the G: T mismatch to a much greater extent than G: A, hMutSa demonstrates a surprisingly equal ratio of competitive inhibition for both G: T and G: A mismatch binding reactions at the H-ras hot spot of mutation. Further, mismatch repair assays reveal almost 2-fold higher efficiency of overall G: A repair (5'-nick directed correct MMR to G: C and incorrect repair to T: A), as compared to G: T overall repair. Conversely, correct MMR of G: T. G: C is significantly higher (96%) than that of G: A -> G: C (60%). Conclusion: Combined, these results suggest that initiation of correct MMR requires the contribution of two separate steps; initial recognition by hMutSa followed by subsequent binding. The 'avidity' of the binding step determines the extent of MMR pathway activation, or the activation of a different cellular pathway. Thus, initial recognition by hMutSa in combination with subsequent decreased binding to the G: A mismatch ( as compared to G: T) may contribute to the observed increased frequency of incorrect repair of G: A, resulting in the predominant GGC -> GTC (Gly -> Val) ras-activating mutation found in a high percentage of human tumors.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Alani E, 1996, MOL CELL BIOL, V16, P5604
[2]   Site- and strand-specific mismatch repair of human H-ras genomic DNA in a mammalian cell line [J].
Arcangeli, L ;
Simonetti, J ;
Pongratz, C ;
Williams, KJ .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1997, 18 (07) :1311-1318
[3]   MAMMALIAN ASSAY FOR SITE-SPECIFIC DNA-DAMAGE PROCESSING USING THE HUMAN H-RAS PROTOONCOGENE [J].
ARCANGELI, L ;
WILLIAMS, KJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1995, 23 (12) :2269-2276
[4]   RAS GENES [J].
BARBACID, M .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1987, 56 :779-827
[5]   Functional interactions and signaling properties of mammalian DNA mismatch repair proteins [J].
Bellacosa, A .
CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION, 2001, 8 (11) :1076-1092
[6]   GENETIC MECHANISMS IN TUMOR INITIATION AND PROGRESSION .10. THE RAS GENE FAMILY AND HUMAN CARCINOGENESIS [J].
BOS, JL .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1988, 195 (03) :255-271
[7]  
BOS JL, 1989, CANCER RES, V49, P4682
[8]   Mammalian DNA mismatch repair [J].
Buermeyer, AB ;
Deschênes, SM ;
Baker, SM ;
Liskay, RM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 1999, 33 :533-564
[9]  
Carethers JM, 2000, IN VIVO, V14, P13
[10]   Steady-state regulation of the human DNA mismatch repair system [J].
Chang, DK ;
Ricciardiello, L ;
Goel, A ;
Chang, CL ;
Boland, CR .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 275 (24) :18424-18431