THE RETURN TO PROTECTIONISM

被引:329
作者
Fajgelbaum, Pablo D. [1 ,2 ]
Goldberg, Pinelopi K. [3 ,4 ]
Kennedy, Patrick J. [5 ]
Khandelwal, Amit K. [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Yale Univ, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] World Bank Grp, Washington, DC USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[6] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
TRADE LIBERALIZATION; DEMAND ELASTICITIES; EXCHANGE-RATES; TARIFFS; IMPACT; COMPETITION; TECHNOLOGY; MARKETS; GRAVITY; PRICES;
D O I
10.1093/qje/qjz036
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
After decades of supporting free trade, in 2018 the United States raised import tariffs and major trade partners retaliated. We analyze the short-run impact of this return to protectionism on the U.S. economy. Import and retaliatory tariffs caused large declines in imports and exports. Prices of imports targeted by tariffs did not fall, implying complete pass-through of tariffs to duty-inclusive prices. The resulting losses to U.S. consumers and firms that buy imports was $51 billion, or 0.27% of GDP. We embed the estimated trade elasticities in a general-equilibrium model of the U.S. economy. After accounting for tariff revenue and gains to domestic producers, the aggregate real income loss was $7.2 billion, or 0.04% of GDP. Import tariffs favored sectors concentrated in politically competitive counties, and the model implies that tradeable-sector workers in heavily Republican counties were the most negatively affected due to the retaliatory tariffs.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 55
页数:55
相关论文
共 68 条