Development of a clinical definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome using the Delphi technique

被引:106
作者
Ferguson, ND
Davis, AM
Slutsky, AS
Stewart, TE
机构
[1] Toronto Western Hosp, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Div Resp, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Physiotherapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
diagnosis; consensus; ARDS; Delphi technique; definition development;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.03.001
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: The objective of this study is to describe the implementation of formal consensus techniques in the development of a clinical definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Materials and Methods: A Delphi consensus process was conducted using e-mail. Sixteen panelists who were both researchers and opinion leaders were systematically recruited. The Delphi technique was performed over 4 rounds on the background of an explicit definition framework. Item generation was performed in round 1, item reduction in rounds 2 and 3, and definition evaluation in round 4. Explicit consensus thresholds were used throughout. Results: Of the 16 panelists, I I actually participated in developing a definition that met a priori consensus rules on the third iteration. New incorporations in the Delphi definition include the use of a standardized oxygenation assessment and the documentation of either a predisposing factor or decreased thoracic compliance. The panelists rated the Delphi definition as acceptable to highly acceptable (median score, 6; range, 5-7 on a 7-point Likert scale). Conclusions: We conclude that it is feasible to consider using formal consensus in the development of future definitions of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Testing of sensibility, reliability, and validity are needed for this preliminary definition; these test results should be incorporated into future iterations of this definition. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 154
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]   EVALUATION OF DEFINITIONS FOR ADULT-RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME [J].
KNAUS, WA ;
SUN, XL ;
HAKIM, RB ;
WAGNER, DP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 150 (02) :311-317
[22]   The acute respiratory distress syndrome: Definitions, severity and clinical outcome - An analysis of 101 clinical investigations [J].
Krafft, P ;
Fridrich, P ;
Pernerstorfer, T ;
Fitzgerald, RD ;
Koc, D ;
Schneider, B ;
Hammerle, AF ;
Steltzer, H .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 22 (06) :519-529
[23]  
Lesur O, 1999, Can Respir J, V6, P71
[24]   Epidemiological data challenge ARDS/ALI definition [J].
Lewandowski, K .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 25 (09) :884-886
[25]   Incidence and mortality after acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome in Sweden, Denmark, and Iceland [J].
Luhr, OR ;
Antonsen, K ;
Karlsson, M ;
Aardal, S ;
Thorsteinsson, A ;
Frostell, CG ;
Bonde, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (06) :1849-1861
[26]  
MARINELLI WA, 1994, CLIN CHEST MED, V15, P517
[27]  
Matthay M A, 1999, Chest, V116, p119S
[28]   Interobserver variation in interpreting chest radiographs for the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome [J].
Meade, MO ;
Cook, RJ ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Groll, R ;
Kachura, JR ;
Bedard, M ;
Cook, DJ ;
Slutsky, AS ;
Stewart, TE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 161 (01) :85-90
[29]   ESTABLISHING THE RELATIVE ACCURACY OF 3 NEW DEFINITIONS OF THE ADULT-RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME [J].
MOSS, M ;
GOODMAN, PL ;
HEINIG, M ;
BARKIN, S ;
ACKERSON, L ;
PARSONS, PE .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (10) :1629-1637
[30]   Convening expert panels to identify mental capacity assessment items [J].
Naglie, G ;
Silberfeld, M ;
ORourke, K ;
Fried, B ;
Durham, N ;
Bombardier, C ;
Detsky, A .
CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 1995, 14 (04) :697-705