Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: Effect of alcohol

被引:573
作者
Richards, JB [1 ]
Zhang, L [1 ]
Mitchell, SH [1 ]
de Wit, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Psychiat, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
impulsivity self-control; delay discounting; probability discounting; alcohol; choice; humans;
D O I
10.1901/jeab.1999.71-121
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Little is known about the acute effects of drugs of abuse on impulsivity and self-control. In this study impulsivity was assessed in humans using a computer task that measured delay and probability discounting. Discounting describes how much the value of a reward (or punisher) is decreased when its occurrence is either delayed or uncertain. Twenty-four healthy adult volunteers ingested a moderate dose of ethanol < 0.5 or 0.8 g/kg ethanol; n = 12 at each dose) or placebo before completing the discounting task. In the task the participants were given a series of choices between a small, immediate, certain amount of money and $10 that was either delayed (0, 2, 30, 180, or 365 days) or probabilistic (i.e., certainty of receipt was 1.0, .9, .75, .5, or .25). The point at which each individual was indifferent between the smaller immediate or certain reward and the $10 delayed or probabilistic reward was identified using an adjusting-amount procedure. The results indicated that (a) delay and probability discounting were well described by a hyperbolic function; (b) delay and probability discounting were positively correlated within subjects; (c) delay and probability discounting were moderately correlated with personality measures of impulsivity; and (d) alcohol had no effect on discounting.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 143
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   SPECIOUS REWARD - BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF IMPULSIVENESS AND IMPULSE CONTROL [J].
AINSLIE, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1975, 82 (04) :463-496
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1954, SOCIAL LEARNING CLIN
[3]  
BRADSHAW CM, 1992, Q J EXP PSYCHOL-B, V44B, P1
[4]   AN EMPIRICAL DEMONSTRATION OF RISK-SENSITIVE FORAGING PREFERENCES [J].
CARACO, T ;
MARTINDALE, S ;
WHITTAM, TS .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1980, 28 (AUG) :820-830
[5]  
DEROGATIS LR, 1983, SCL 90 R MANUAL, V2
[6]   PREFERENCE FOR ETHANOL AND DIAZEPAM IN LIGHT AND MODERATE SOCIAL DRINKERS - A WITHIN-SUBJECTS STUDY [J].
DEWIT, H ;
DOTY, P .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 115 (04) :529-538
[7]   Behavioral responses to ethanol in light and moderate social drinkers following naltrexone pretreatment [J].
Doty, P ;
Kirk, JM ;
Cramblett, MJ ;
deWit, H .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1997, 47 (02) :109-116
[8]   EFFECT OF SETTING ON THE REINFORCING AND SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF ETHANOL IN SOCIAL DRINKERS [J].
DOTY, P ;
DEWIT, H .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 118 (01) :19-27
[9]   EFFECTS OF ONDANSETRON PRETREATMENT ON ACUTE RESPONSES TO ETHANOL IN SOCIAL DRINKERS [J].
DOTY, P ;
ZACNY, JP ;
DEWIT, H .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 5 (4-5) :461-469
[10]  
DUFFY JD, 1995, CAN J PSYCHIAT, V40, P257