Are Valuations from Nonhypothetical Choice Experiments Different from Those of Experimental Auctions?
被引:53
作者:
Gracia, Azucena
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Santiago de Compostela, Fac C Econ & Empresarias, Dept Fundamentos Analise Econ, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
Gracia, Azucena
Loureiro, Maria L.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Santiago de Compostela, Fac C Econ & Empresarias, Dept Fundamentos Analise Econ, Santiago De Compostela 15782, SpainUniv Santiago de Compostela, Fac C Econ & Empresarias, Dept Fundamentos Analise Econ, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
Loureiro, Maria L.
[1
]
Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Arkansas, Div Agr, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USAUniv Santiago de Compostela, Fac C Econ & Empresarias, Dept Fundamentos Analise Econ, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr.
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Fac C Econ & Empresarias, Dept Fundamentos Analise Econ, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
[2] Univ Arkansas, Div Agr, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
Due to the importance of comparability and external validity of results, nonhypothetical experimental methods are increasingly used to elicit consumers' willingness to pay for various goods. Two of the increasingly popular preference elicitation methods are the nonhypothetical choice experiments and experimental auctions. We conduct experiments to compare willingness to pay estimates elicited from both methods. Our results generally suggest that valuations elicited from experimental auctions can differ from those obtained from nonhypothetical choice experiments.