High dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels

被引:25
作者
Kanfer, EJ
McGuigan, D
Samson, D
Abboudi, Z
Abrahamson, G
Apperley, JF
Chilcott, S
Craddock, C
Davis, J
MacDonald, C
Macdonald, D
Olavarria, E
Philpott, N
Rustin, GJS
Seckl, MJ
Sekhar, M
Stern, S
Newlands, ES
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Haematol, NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hosp,Sch Med, London W12 0NN, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Med Oncol, NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hosp,Sch Med, London W12 0NN, England
关键词
etoposide; progenitor cell; mobilization;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1998.603
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
High-dose etoposide (2.0-2.4 g m(-2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective strategy to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), although in some patients this is associated with significant toxicity. Sixty-three patients with malignancy were enrolled into this non-randomized sequential study. The majority (55/63, 87%) had received at least two prior regimens of chemotherapy, and seven patients had previously failed to mobilize following high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. Consecutive patient groups received etoposide at three dose levels [2.0 g m(-2) (n = 22), 1.8 g m(-2) (n = 20) and 1.6 g m(-2) (n = 21)] followed by daily G-CSF. Subsequent leukaphereses were assayed for CD34(+) cell content, with a target total collection of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells kg(-1). Toxicity was assessed by the development of significant mucositis, the requirement for parenteral antibiotics or blood component support and rehospitalization incidence. Ten patients (16%) had less than the minimum target yield collected. Median collections in the three groups were 4.7 (2 g m(-2)), 5.7 (1.8 g m(-2)) and 6.5 (1.6 g m(-2)) x 10(6) CD34(+) cells kg(-1), Five of the seven patients who had previously failed cyclophosphamide mobilization achieved more than the target yield, Rehospitalization incidence was significantly lower in patients receiving 1.6 g m(-2) etoposide than in those receiving 2.0 g m(-2) (P = 0.03). These data suggest that high-dose etoposide with G-CSF is an efficient mobilization regimen in the majority of heavily pretreated patients, including those who have previously failed on high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. An etoposide dose of 1.6 g m(-2) appears to be as effective as higher doses but less toxic.
引用
收藏
页码:928 / 932
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]  
HAAS R, 1994, BLOOD, V83, P3787
[12]  
HERZIG RH, 1991, CANCER, V67, P292, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910101)67:1+<292::AID-CNCR2820671314>3.0.CO
[13]  
2-7
[14]   Progenitor cell yield in sequential blood stem cell mobilization in the same patients: Insights into chemotherapy dose escalation and combination of haemopoietic growth factor and chemotherapy [J].
Lie, AKW ;
Rawling, TP ;
Bayly, JL ;
To, LB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1996, 95 (01) :39-44
[15]  
MARANGOLO M, 1989, BONE MARROW TRANSPL, V4, P405
[16]   Stem cell mobilization in resistant or relapsed lymphoma: superior yield of progenitor cells following a salvage regimen comprising ifosphamide, etoposide and epirubicin compared to intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide [J].
McQuaker, IG ;
Haynes, AP ;
Stainer, C ;
Anderson, S ;
Russell, NH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1997, 98 (01) :228-233
[17]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF UNDILUTED OR DILUTED HIGH-DOSE ETOPOSIDE WITH OR WITHOUT BUSULFAN ADMINISTERED TO PATIENTS WITH HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES [J].
MROSS, K ;
BEWERMEIER, P ;
KRUGER, W ;
STOCKSCHLADER, M ;
ZANDER, A ;
HOSSFELD, DK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (07) :1468-1474
[18]  
PETTENGELL R, 1993, BLOOD, V82, P2239
[19]  
POSTMUS PE, 1984, CANCER TREAT REP, V68, P1471
[20]  
RICHMAN CM, 1976, BLOOD, V47, P1031