Spatial filter approach for evaluation of the surface Laplacian of the electroencephalogram and magnetoencephalogram

被引:31
作者
Bradshaw, LA
Wikswo, JP
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Living State Phys Grp, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] Lipscomb Univ, Dept Phys & Engn Sci, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
magnetoencephalogram; brain electroencephalogram; spatial resolution; inverse problem;
D O I
10.1114/1.1352642
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The surface Laplacian is a technique that has been utilized to improve the spatial resolution of the electroencephalogram (EEG) and the magnetoencephalogram (MEG). We investigate the amount of improvement to the spatial resolution afforded by the surface Laplacian by examining the spatial filters that describe the relationship between cortical current sources and the surface Laplacian. The surface Laplacian spatial filters extend into higher spatial frequencies than do raw signal spatial filters, particularly for EEG Laplacian spatial filters, indicating that substantial improvement in spatial resolution is possible. However, the response of the surface Laplacian operation to the nature and amount of noise in the raw EEG and MEG signals is of paramount importance. Spatially correlated noise, coupled with uncorrelated noise, requires additional regularization of inverse spatial filters resulting in a decrease in spatial resolution. Substantial improvements in spatial resolution may-be obtained using the surface Laplacian techniques as long as correlated noise levels are small and raw signals have relatively high signal-to-noise ratios. (C) 2001 Biomedical Engineering Society.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 213
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Spline Laplacian estimate of EEG potentials over a realistic magnetic resonance-constructed scalp surface model [J].
Babiloni, F ;
Babiloni, C ;
Carducci, F ;
Fattorini, L ;
Onorati, P ;
Urbano, A .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 98 (04) :363-373
[2]  
Babiloni Fabio, 1995, Brain Topography, V8, P35, DOI 10.1007/BF01187668
[3]   MEG, EEG AND ECOG - DISCUSSION [J].
BAUMGARTNER, C .
ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 89 :91-92
[4]   Spatial filter approach for comparison of the forward and inverse problems of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography [J].
Bradshaw, LA ;
Wijesinghe, RS ;
Wikswo, JP .
ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 29 (03) :214-226
[5]  
BRADSHAW LA, 1995, THESIS VANDERBILT U
[6]   DEMONSTRATION OF USEFUL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAM AND ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM [J].
COHEN, D ;
CUFFIN, BN .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 56 (01) :38-51
[7]   MEG VERSUS EEG LOCALIZATION TEST USING IMPLANTED SOURCES IN THE HUMAN BRAIN [J].
COHEN, D ;
CUFFIN, BN ;
YUNOKUCHI, K ;
MANIEWSKI, R ;
PURCELL, C ;
COSGROVE, GR ;
IVES, J ;
KENNEDY, JG ;
SCHOMER, DL .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1990, 28 (06) :811-817
[8]   A RANDOM DIPOLE MODEL FOR SPONTANEOUS BRAIN ACTIVITY [J].
DEMUNCK, JC ;
VIJN, PCM ;
DASILVA, FHL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1992, 39 (08) :791-804
[9]  
GEVINS A, 1989, Brain Topography, V2, P37, DOI 10.1007/BF01128842
[10]  
GEVINS A, 1991, Brain Topography, V4, P125, DOI 10.1007/BF01132769