Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005

被引:376
作者
Makarov, Danil V. [1 ]
Trock, Bruce J. [1 ]
Humphreys, Elizabeth B. [1 ]
Mangold, Leslie A. [1 ]
Walsh, Patrick C. [1 ]
Epstein, Jonathan I. [1 ]
Partin, Alan W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Dept Urol & Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.042
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To update the 2001 "Partin tables" with a contemporary patient cohort and revised variable categorization, correcting for the effects of stage migration. Methods We analyzed 5730 men treated with prostatectomy (without neoadjuvant therapy) between 2000 and 2005 at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Average age was 57 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of organ-confined disease, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle involvement, or lymph node involvement. Predictor variables included preoperative prostate -specific antigen (PSA) level (0 to 2.5, 2.6 to 4.0, 4.1 to 6.0, 6.1 to 10.0, and greater than 10.0 ng/mL), clinical stage (T1c, T2a, and T2b/T2c), and biopsy Gleason score (5 to 6, 3 + 4 = 7, 4 + 3 = 7, or 8 to 10). Bootstrap resampling was used to generate 95% confidence intervals for predicted probabilities. Results Seventy-seven percent of patients had Tlc, 76% had Gleason score 5 to 6, 80% had a PSA level between 2.5 and 10.0 ng/mL, and 73% had organ-confined disease. Nomograms were developed for the predicted probability of pathologically organ-confined disease, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or lymph node involvement. The risk of non-organ-confined disease increased with increases in any individual prognostic factor. The dramatic decrease in clinical stage T2c compared with the patient series used in the previous models resulted in T2b and T2c being combined as a single predictor in the nomogram. Conclusions These updated "Partin tables" were generated to reflect trends in presentation and pathologic stage for men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer at our institution. Clinicians and patients can use these nomograms to help make important decisions regarding management of prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1095 / 1101
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]  
2-5
[22]   Counseling men with prostate cancer: A nomogram for predicting the presence of small, moderately differentiated, confined tumors [J].
Kattan, MW ;
Eastham, JA ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Maru, N ;
Scardino, PT ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Graefen, M ;
Huland, H ;
Koh, H ;
Shariat, SF ;
Slawin, KM ;
Ohori, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) :1792-1797
[23]   Pathological outcomes and biochemical progression in men with T1c prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy with prostate specific antigen 2.6 to 4.0 vs 4.1 to 6.0 ng/ml [J].
Makarov, Danil V. ;
Humphreys, Elizabeth B. ;
Mangold, Leslie A. ;
Walsh, Patrick C. ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Freedland, Stephen J. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (02) :554-558
[24]   Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: Is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4+3 and 3+4 independent of the number of involved cores? [J].
Makarov, DV ;
Sanderson, H ;
Partin, AW ;
Epstein, JI .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (06) :2440-2442
[25]   Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: A nomogram for staging prostate cancer [J].
Ohori, M ;
Kattan, MW ;
Koh, H ;
Maru, N ;
Slawin, KM ;
Shariat, S ;
Muramoto, M ;
Reuter, VE ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (05) :1844-1849
[26]   Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium [J].
Partin, AW ;
Mangold, LA ;
Lamm, DM ;
Walsh, PC ;
Epstein, JI ;
Pearson, JD .
UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (06) :843-848
[27]   THE USE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, CLINICAL STAGE AND GLEASON SCORE TO PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE IN MEN WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
PARTIN, AW ;
YOO, J ;
CARTER, HB ;
PEARSON, JD ;
CHAN, DW ;
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (01) :110-114
[28]   Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer - A multi-institutional update [J].
Partin, AW ;
Kattan, MW ;
Subong, ENP ;
Walsh, PC ;
Wojno, KJ ;
Oesterling, JE ;
Scardino, PT ;
Pearson, JD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (18) :1445-1451
[29]   How well does the Partin nomogram predict pathological stage after radical prostatectomy in a community based population? Results of the cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor [J].
Penson, DF ;
Grossfeld, GD ;
Li, YP ;
Henning, JM ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) :1653-1657
[30]   Effect of verification bias on screening for prostate cancer by measurement of prostate-specific antigen [J].
Punglia, RS ;
D'Amico, AV ;
Catalona, WJ ;
Roehl, KA ;
Kuntz, KM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (04) :335-342