Prospective evaluation of environmental contamination by Clostridium difficile in isolation side rooms

被引:78
作者
Verity, P
Wilcox, MH [1 ]
Fawley, W
Parnell, P
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Dept Microbiol, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Gen Infirm, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1053/jhin.2001.1078
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We determined prospectively the frequency, persistence and molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile environmental contamination after detergent-based cleaning in side rooms used to isolate patients with C. difficile diarrhoea. Approximately one-quarter of all environmental sites in side rooms sampled over four-week periods were contaminated with C. difficile. The overall side room prevalence of environmental C. difficile declined from 35% initially, to 24% in week 2, 18% in week 3, and 16% in week 4. The bed frame was the most common site from which C. difficile was recovered, although the floor was the most contaminated site in terms of total numbers of colonies. C. difficile was recovered significantly more frequently from swabs plated directly on to C. difficile selective media containing lysozyme than from enrichment broth (P < 0.001), emphasizing the benefit of lysozyme supplementation. The great majority of C. difficile isolates (87% of all isolates, 84% of patient isolates) was indistinguishable from the UK epidemic strain (PCR ribotype 1). It thus could not be determined whether environmental contamination was a cause or a consequence of diarrhoea. Our findings highlight the need for improved approaches to hospital environmental hygiene, and call into question current UK guidelines that recommend detergent-based cleaning to remove environmental C. difficile, In particular, improved cleaning of frequently touched sites in the immediate bed space area is required. (C) 2001 The Hospital Infection Society.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 209
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
ANAND A, 1994, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V89, P519
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Am J Infect Control, V27, P503
[3]  
*COMM DIS SURV GRO, 2000, COMMUN DIS REP CDR W, V10, P135
[4]  
*DEP HLTH PUBL HLT, 1994, CLOST DIFF INF
[5]  
FAWLEY WN, 2001, IN PRESS EPIDEMIOL I
[6]   Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice [J].
Holden, JD .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 7 (01) :65-70
[7]   RECURRENCES OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE DIARRHEA NOT CAUSED BY THE ORIGINAL INFECTING ORGANISM [J].
JOHNSON, S ;
ADELMANN, A ;
CLABOTS, CR ;
PETERSON, LR ;
GERDING, DN .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1989, 159 (02) :340-343
[8]   ACQUISITION OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE FROM THE HOSPITAL ENVIRONMENT [J].
KAATZ, GW ;
GITLIN, SD ;
SCHABERG, DR ;
WILSON, KH ;
KAUFFMAN, CA ;
SEO, SM ;
FEKETY, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1988, 127 (06) :1289-1294
[9]   USE OF ARBITRARY PRIMER PCR TO TYPE CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE AND COMPARISON OF RESULTS WITH THOSE BY IMMUNOBLOT TYPING [J].
KILLGORE, GE ;
KATO, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (06) :1591-1593
[10]   ISOLATION OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE FROM THE ENVIRONMENT AND CONTACTS OF PATIENTS WITH ANTIBIOTIC-ASSOCIATED COLITIS [J].
KIM, KH ;
FEKETY, R ;
BATTS, DH ;
BROWN, D ;
CUDMORE, M ;
SILVA, J ;
WATERS, D .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1981, 143 (01) :42-50