Why Do You Vote and Vote as You Do?

被引:12
作者
Carlsson, Fredrik [1 ]
Johansson-Stenman, Olof [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Econ, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
SELF-INTEREST; PREFERENCES; IMPACT; CHOICE; NORM; REDISTRIBUTION; UNEMPLOYMENT; COOPERATION; TURNOUT; CHARITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-6435.2010.00475.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
P>The conventional rational voter model has problems explaining why people vote, since the costs typically exceed the expected benefits. This paper presents Swedish survey evidence regarding i) Why people vote, ii) Why people vote as they do and their beliefs about why others vote as they do, and iii) How bad not voting and voting selfishly are perceived to be. Large majorities find it important to vote in order to affect the outcome, because it is a democratic obligation to vote, and because they want to express their political views. While most respondents say that they and others vote as they do both because of self-interest and because of conviction, people generally believe that they themselves vote less selfishly than do others, consistent with the hypothesis that people wish to have a self-image of being a good person. Moreover, people tend to believe that others with similar political views as themselves vote less selfishly than do people with the opposite political views, which is consistent with social identity theory. The norm saying that it is bad not to vote appears to be much stronger than the norm against voting selfishly. Women and older individuals are more affected by the norm saying that it is an obligation to vote. A majority believe it is unethical to vote for a certain party out of self-interest, although right-wing persons believe so to a lower extent.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 516
页数:22
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Why are small firms different? Managers' views [J].
Agell, J .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 106 (03) :437-452
[2]   Survey evidence on wage rigidity and unemployment: Sweden in the 1990s [J].
Agell, J ;
Lundborg, P .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 105 (01) :15-29
[3]   RATIONAL CHOICE AND TURNOUT [J].
ALDRICH, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 37 (01) :246-278
[4]   Who trusts others? [J].
Alesina, A ;
La Ferrara, E .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2002, 85 (02) :207-234
[5]   Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities [J].
Alesina, A ;
La Ferrara, E .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2005, 89 (5-6) :897-931
[6]   Changing the social norm of tax compliance by voting [J].
Alm, J ;
McClelland, GH ;
Schulze, WD .
KYKLOS, 1999, 52 (02) :141-171
[7]   Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica [J].
Alpizar, Francisco ;
Carlsson, Fredrik ;
Johansson-Stenman, Olof .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2008, 92 (5-6) :1047-1060
[8]   Endogenous economic voting: evidence from the 1997 British election [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
Mendes, SM ;
Tverdova, YV .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2004, 23 (04) :683-708
[9]   Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism [J].
Andreoni, J ;
Vesterlund, L .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (01) :293-312
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Special Interest Politics