Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms

被引:96
作者
Pohlman, S
Powell, KA
Obuchowski, NA
Chilcote, WA
GrundfestBroniatowski, S
机构
[1] OHIO STATE UNIV,CTR BIOMED ENGN,COLUMBUS,OH 43210
[2] CLEVELAND CLIN FDN,DEPT BIOSTAT & EPIDEMIOL,CLEVELAND,OH 44195
[3] CLEVELAND CLIN FDN,DIV RADIOL,CLEVELAND,OH 44195
[4] CLEVELAND CLIN FDN,DEPT SURG,CLEVELAND,OH 44195
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.597707
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to develop a technique to distinguish benign and malignant breast lesions in secondarily digitized mammograms. A set of 51 mammograms (two views/patient) containing lesions of known pathology were evaluated using six different morphological descriptors: circularity, mu(R)/sigma(R) (where mu(R)=mean radial distance of tumor boundary, sigma(R)=standard deviation); compactness, P-2/A (where P=perimeter length of tumor boundary and A=area of the tumor); normalized moment classifier; fractal dimension; and a tumor boundary roughness (TBR) measurement (the number of angles in;the tumor boundary with more than one boundary point divided by the total number of angles in the boundary). The lesion was segmented from the surrounding background using an adaptive region growing technique. Ninety-seven percent of the lesions were segmented using this approach. An ROC analysis was performed for each parameter and the results of this analysis were compared to each other and to those obtained from a subjective review by two board-certified radiologists who specialize in mammography. The results of the analysis indicate that all six parameters are diagnostic for malignancy with areas under their ROC curves ranging from 0.759 to 0.928. We observed a trend towards increased specificity at low false-negative rates (0.01 and 0.001) with the TBR measurement. Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy of a classification model based on this parameter was similar to that of the subjective reviewers. (C) 1996 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1337 / 1345
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] ACKERMAN LV, 1972, CANCER, V30, P1025, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197210)30:4<1025::AID-CNCR2820300425>3.0.CO
  • [2] 2-7
  • [3] *AM CANC SOC, CANC FACTS FIG 1995
  • [4] *AM JOINT COMM CAN, 1992, MAN STAG CANC, P145
  • [5] AN APPROACH TO AUTOMATED DETECTION OF TUMORS IN MAMMOGRAMS
    BRZAKOVIC, D
    LUO, XM
    BRZAKOVIC, P
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1990, 9 (03) : 233 - 241
  • [6] Castleman KR., 1979, DIGITAL IMAGE PROCES
  • [7] DIGITIZATION REQUIREMENTS IN MAMMOGRAPHY - EFFECTS ON COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION OF MICROCALCIFICATIONS
    CHAN, HP
    NIKLASON, LT
    IKEDA, DM
    LAM, KL
    ADLER, DD
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (07) : 1203 - 1211
  • [8] EVALUATING THE FRACTAL DIMENSION OF SURFACES
    DUBUC, B
    ZUCKER, SW
    TRICOT, C
    QUINIOU, JF
    WEHBI, D
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1989, 425 (1868) : 113 - 127
  • [9] Dubuc B., 1987, Proceedings of the SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, V845, P241, DOI 10.1117/12.976511
  • [10] COMPUTERIZED CHARACTERIZATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC MASSES - ANALYSIS OF SPICULATION
    GIGER, ML
    VYBORNY, CJ
    SCHMIDT, RA
    [J]. CANCER LETTERS, 1994, 77 (2-3) : 201 - 211