Minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a valid option for the treatment of benign uterine pathologies

被引:18
作者
Panici, PB [1 ]
Zullo, MA [1 ]
Angioli, R [1 ]
Muzii, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Gynecol, I-00155 Rome, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY | 2005年 / 119卷 / 02期
关键词
minilaparotomy hysterectomy; abdominal hysterectomy; vaginal hysterectomy; laparosopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.07.039
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate feasibility and outcome of minilaparotomy hysterectomy in a consecutive series of patients, Study design: Cohort analytic study. From October 1995 to March 2001, 148 out of 228 (65%) consecutive hysterectomies for benign gynecologic disease were performed by an abdominal route. Minilaparotonly hysterectomy (transversal cutaneous incision < 10cm, within the pubic hair) was attempted in all patients with benign uterine disease and contraindications for vaginal surgery, Surgical parameters were prospectively assessed in terms of length of incision, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of dens, perioperative complications, and length of postoperative stay. Results: A minilaparotomic approach was performed in 118 patients (80%). Conversion to Pfannenstiel was necessary in three cases. The minilaparotomy incision, 8 cm (range 6-10) of median length. was performed below the pubic hair line, The median operating time was 50 min (range 34-88). No intraoperative complications or perioperative blood transfusions were reported, while minor postoperative complications occurred in 16 patients (14%) The median postoperative stay was three days (range 2-5), Conclusions: The minilaparotomy hysterectomy is feasible in the majority of women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. Because of the excellent outcome achieved, it should be considered a valid alternative to the classic abdominal hysterectomy. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 231
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BenedettiPanici P, 1996, OBSTET GYNECOL, V87, P456
[2]   The feasibility of vaginal hysterectomy [J].
Cosson, M ;
Querleu, D ;
Subtil, D ;
Switala, I ;
Buchet, B ;
Crepin, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1996, 64 (01) :95-99
[3]   Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance:: Randomized study [J].
Daraï, E ;
Soriano, D ;
Kimata, P ;
Laplace, C ;
Lecuru, F .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (05) :712-716
[4]   CLINICAL INDICATIONS FOR HYSTERECTOMY ROUTE - PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS OR PHYSICIAN PREFERENCE [J].
DORSEY, JH ;
STEINBERG, EP ;
HOLTZ, PM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (05) :1452-1460
[5]   Challenging generally accepted contraindications to vaginal hysterectomy [J].
Doucette, RC ;
Sharp, HT ;
Alder, SC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 184 (07) :1386-1391
[6]   A randomized trial with a cost-consequence analysis after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Ellström, M ;
Ferraz-Nunes, J ;
Hahlin, M ;
Olsson, JH .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 91 (01) :30-34
[7]   Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Falcone, T ;
Paraiso, MFR ;
Mascha, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (04) :955-962
[8]   Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997 [J].
Farquhar, CM ;
Steiner, CA .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (02) :229-234
[9]  
FLICKINGER L, 1986, OBSTET GYNECOL, V68, P855
[10]   Minilaparotomy for the ambulatory management of ovarian cysts [J].
Flynn, M ;
Niloff, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (06) :1727-1730