Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970-2002

被引:141
作者
Hagewen, KJ [1 ]
Morgan, SP
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Sociol, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Inst Ethn Studies, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Sociol, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00081.x
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Cross-nationally, observed fertility is well below mean levels of reported ideal family size and also usually well below survey respondents' fertility desires and intentions. The United States is an exception. In this article we: (1) discuss the importance of fertility ideals and intentions for understanding observed fertility levels, (2) propose a model that can account for variable attitude-behavior consistency, and (3) use this model as a framework to examine trends in American women's fertility ideals, intentions, and actual fertility. Our study uses data from the General Social Surveys and the Current Population Surveys. We ask whether preferences and intentions for moderate family sizes have eroded with time. The answer is remarkably clear: the dominant American ideals and intentions are for two or three children, and these preferences have persisted across the last three decades. The unusual aggregate correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States is explained by an apparent offsetting of factors that increase/decrease fertility relative to intentions.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / +
页数:22
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [61] Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior?
    Schoen, R
    Astone, NM
    Kim, YJ
    Nathanson, CA
    Fields, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1999, 61 (03): : 790 - 799
  • [62] Newlyweds' family-formation preferences
    Sensibaugh, CC
    Yarab, PE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 131 (05) : 530 - 540
  • [63] STEREOTYPES OF TRADITIONAL AND NON-TRADITIONAL CHILDBEARING ROLES
    SHIELDS, SA
    COOPER, PE
    [J]. SEX ROLES, 1983, 9 (03) : 363 - 376
  • [64] A COMPARISON OF VOLUNTARILY CHILDFREE ADULTS AND PARENTS
    SOMERS, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1993, 55 (03): : 643 - 650
  • [65] TERHUNE KW, 1974, REV ACTUAL EXPECTED
  • [66] FAMILY SIZE - IMPLICIT POLICIES AND ASSUMED PSYCHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES
    THOMPSON, VD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1974, 30 (04) : 93 - 124
  • [67] MEASURING FERTILITY DEMAND
    THOMSON, E
    BRANDRETH, Y
    [J]. DEMOGRAPHY, 1995, 32 (01) : 81 - 96
  • [68] EVIDENCE BEARING ON THE CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY OF IDEAL FAMILY-SIZE
    TRENT, RB
    [J]. POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENT, 1980, 3 (3-4) : 309 - 327
  • [69] United Nations Population Division, 2001, WORLD POP MON 2001 P
  • [70] VEENHOVEN R, 1989, ADOLESCENCE, V24, P155