Intensity and the ratios of compounds in the scent of snapdragon flowers affect scent discrimination by honeybees (Apis mellifera)

被引:115
作者
Wright, GA [1 ]
Lutmerding, A
Dudareva, N
Smith, BH
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Entomol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Hort & Landscape Architecture, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY | 2005年 / 191卷 / 02期
关键词
floral scent; honeybees; olfaction; discrimination; snapdragon;
D O I
10.1007/s00359-004-0576-6
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Floral scent is used by pollinators during foraging to identify and discriminate among flowers. The ability to discriminate among scents may depend on both scent intensity and the ratios of the concentrations of the volatile compounds of a complex mixture rather than on the presence of a few compounds. We used four scent-emitting cultivars of snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus) to test this hypothesis by examining the ability of honeybees to differentiate among their scents. Each cultivar produced three monoterpenes (myrcene, E-beta-ocimene, and linalool) and five phenylpropanoids (methylbenzoate, acetophenone, dimethoxytoluene, cis-methylcinnamate, and trans-methylcinnamate). Cultivars were reliably classifed by their scents in a canonical discriminant analysis. Honeybees were unable to discriminate among the scents of flowers of the same cultivar in our assay. The ability of honeybees to discriminate among the scents of different cultivars was a function of the intensity of the. oral scent. Discrimination was also correlated to the distance among the scents described by the discriminant analysis; the cultivars that had the greatest differences observed in the discriminant analysis were the easiest to discriminate. Our results show that honeybees are capable of using all of the floral volatiles to discriminate subtle differences in scent.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 114
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Floral scents in butterfly-pollinated plants:: possible convergence in chemical composition [J].
Andersson, S ;
Nilsson, LA ;
Groth, I ;
Bergström, G .
BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2002, 140 (02) :129-153
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, APPL MULTIVARIATE AN
[3]  
Ayasse M, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P1995, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01243.x
[4]   Intraspecific variation of floral scent chemistry in Magnolia kobus DC. (Magnoliaceae) [J].
Azuma, H ;
Toyota, M ;
Asakawa, Y .
JOURNAL OF PLANT RESEARCH, 2001, 114 (1116) :411-422
[5]   FLORAL SCENTS OF BARTSIA-ALPINA (SCROPHULARIACEAE) - CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION AND VARIATION BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL PLANTS [J].
BERGSTROM, J ;
BERGSTROM, G .
NORDIC JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1989, 9 (04) :363-365
[6]   Olfactory conditioning in the honey bee, Apis mellifera: Effects of odor intensity [J].
Bhagavan, S ;
Smith, BH .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1997, 61 (01) :107-117
[7]   CLASSICAL-CONDITIONING OF PROBOSCIS EXTENSION IN HONEYBEES (APIS-MELLIFERA) [J].
BITTERMAN, ME ;
MENZEL, R ;
FIETZ, A ;
SCHAFER, S .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 97 (02) :107-119
[8]  
Chandra S, 1998, J EXP BIOL, V201, P3113
[9]   Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution [J].
Chittka, L ;
Thomson, JD ;
Waser, NM .
NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, 1999, 86 (08) :361-377
[10]   The effect of similarity between elemental stimuli and compounds in olfactory patterning discriminations [J].
Deisig, N ;
Lachnit, H ;
Giurfa, M .
LEARNING & MEMORY, 2002, 9 (03) :112-121