The effect of similarity between elemental stimuli and compounds in olfactory patterning discriminations

被引:64
作者
Deisig, N
Lachnit, H [1 ]
Giurfa, M
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Biol, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Marburg, Dept Psychol, D-35032 Marburg, Germany
[3] Univ Toulouse 3, Lab Cognit Anim, F-31062 Toulouse, France
关键词
D O I
10.1101/lm.41002
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We studied the ability of honeybees to discriminate between single odorants and binary olfactory mixtures. We analyzed the effect of the number of common elements between these two stimulus classes on olfactory discrimination. We used olfactory conditioning of the honeybees' proboscis extension reflex (PER), a paradigm in which odors can be associated with a reinforcement of sucrose solution. Bees were asked to discriminate reinforced from nonreinforced olfactory stimuli. They were trained with two elemental odors (A and B) versus a binary olfactory mixture. The mixture was either AB (group 2CE, two common elements), AC (group 1CE, one common element A), or CD (group 0CE, no common element). Three groups followed a positive patterning schedule (mixture reinforced and elements nonreinforced: groups 2CE+, 1CE+, and 0CE+) and three other groups a negative patterning schedule (mixture nonreinforced and elements reinforced: groups 2CE-, 1CE-, and 0CE-). We showed that a reduction of similarity (number of common elements) between elemental odors and compounds enhanced the ability to discriminate elements from compounds and that the kind of compound processing used by the bees supports theories that assume nonelemental compound processing (i.e., that exclude the mere summation of the elemental associative strengths upon compound presentation).
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 121
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   CLASSICAL-CONDITIONING OF PROBOSCIS EXTENSION IN HONEYBEES (APIS-MELLIFERA) [J].
BITTERMAN, ME ;
MENZEL, R ;
FIETZ, A ;
SCHAFER, S .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 97 (02) :107-119
[2]   Configural olfactory learning in honeybees: Negative and positive patterning discrimination [J].
Deisig, N ;
Lachnit, H ;
Giurfa, M ;
Hellstern, F .
LEARNING & MEMORY, 2001, 8 (02) :70-78
[3]   Tactile learning in the honeybee [J].
Erber, J ;
Kierzek, S ;
Sander, E ;
Grandy, K .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 183 (06) :737-744
[4]   Odour perception in honeybees: coding information in glomerular patterns [J].
Galizia, CG ;
Menzel, R .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (04) :504-510
[5]   Insect visual perception: complex abilities of simple nervous systems [J].
Giurfa, M ;
Menzel, R .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (04) :505-513
[6]  
Giurfa M, 2001, COGNITIVE ECOLOGY OF POLLINATION: ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR AND FLORAL EVOLUTION, P61, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511542268.005
[7]   Representations of odours and odour mixtures visualized in the honeybee brain [J].
Joerges, J ;
Kuttner, A ;
Galizia, CG ;
Menzel, R .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :285-288
[8]   Evidence for the application of rules in Pavlovian electrodermal conditioning with humans [J].
Lachnit, H ;
Lober, K ;
Reinhard, G ;
Kinder, A .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 56 (02) :151-166
[9]   Olfactory discrimination ability and odor structure-activity relationships in honeybees [J].
Laska, M ;
Galizia, CG ;
Giurfa, M ;
Menzel, R .
CHEMICAL SENSES, 1999, 24 (04) :429-438
[10]   USING ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE WITH A DICHOTOMOUS DEPENDENT VARIABLE - EMPIRICAL STUDY [J].
LUNNEY, GH .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1970, 7 (04) :263-269