Australian national birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age, 1998-2007

被引:315
作者
Dobbins, Timothy A. [1 ]
Sullivan, Elizabeth A. [2 ]
Roberts, Christine L. [3 ]
Simpson, Judy M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Perinatal & Reprod Epidemiol Res Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Kolling Inst, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
HEALTH OUTCOMES; RISK; OVERWEIGHT; PREGNANCY; STANDARDS; OBESITY; GROWTH; TRENDS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.5694/mja11.11331
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To present updated national birthweight percentiles by gestational age for male and female singleton infants born in Australia. Design and setting: Cross-sectional population-based study of 2.53 million singleton live births in Australia between 1998 and 2007. Main outcome measures: Birthweight percentiles by gestational age and sex. Results: Between 1998 and 2007, women in Australia gave birth to 2 539 237 live singleton infants. Of these, 2 537 627 had a gestational age between 20 and 44 weeks, and sex and birthweight data were available. Birthweight percentiles are presented by sex and gestational age for a total of 2 528 641 births, after excluding 8986 infants with outlying birthweights. Since the publication of the previous Australian birthweight percentiles in 1999, median birthweight for term babies has increased between 0 and 25 g for boys and between 5 g and 45 g for girls. Conclusions: There has been only a small increase in birthweight percentiles for babies of both sexes and most gestational ages since 1991-1994. These national percentiles provide a current Australian reference for clinicians and researchers assessing weight at birth.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 294
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter? [J].
Hutcheon, J. A. ;
Zhang, X. ;
Cnattingius, S. ;
Kramer, M. S. ;
Platt, R. W. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (11) :1397-1404
[12]   The case against customised birthweight standards [J].
Hutcheon, Jennifer A. ;
Zhang, Xun ;
Platt, Robert W. ;
Cnattingius, Sven ;
Kramer, Michael S. .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) :11-16
[13]   Quality of Data in Perinatal Population Health Databases A Systematic Review [J].
Lain, Samantha J. ;
Hadfield, Ruth M. ;
Raynes-Greenow, Camille H. ;
Ford, Jane B. ;
Mealing, Nicole M. ;
Algert, Charles S. ;
Roberts, Christine L. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2012, 50 (04) :E7-E20
[14]  
Lancaster P, 1994, PERINATAL STAT SERIE, V1
[15]   Risk of Morbid Perinatal Outcomes in Small-for-Gestational-Age Pregnancies Customized Compared With Conventional Standards of Fetal Growth [J].
Larkin, Jacob C. ;
Hill, Lyndon M. ;
Speer, Paul D. ;
Simhan, Hyagriv N. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (01) :21-27
[16]  
Laws P, 2009, PERINATAL STAT SERIE
[17]  
Laws PJ, 2004, PERINATAL STAT SERIE
[18]  
LUBCHENCO LO, 1963, PEDIATRICS, V32, P793
[19]  
Nassar N, 2001, PERINATAL STAT SERIE, V10
[20]   Risk factors and obstetric complications of large for gestational age births with adjustments for community effects: results from a new cohort study [J].
Ng, Shu-Kay ;
Olog, Adriana ;
Spinks, Anneliese B. ;
Cameron, Cate M. ;
Searle, Judy ;
McClure, Rod J. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 10