Assessing fluid change in hemodialysis: Whole body versus sum of segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy

被引:38
作者
Chanchairujira, T [1 ]
Mehta, RL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
bioimpedance spectroscopy; hemodialysis; chronic hemodialysis; body water; electrical conduction; dialysis related morbidity; hypotension;
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00074.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Accurate estimation of extracellular fluid (ECF) is an important factor in assessing dry weight in hemodialysis patients. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a simple method to determine the compartmental distribution of body water in HD patients. Recent studies have shown that sum of segmental BIS (SBIS) is less affected by the change of body position and may be more accurate in measuring ECF change than whole body BIS (WBIS). We have compared SBIS and WBIS in estimating change in fluid volume during hemodialysis. Methods. Twenty-eight patients (male 10, female 18) were studied during their regular hemodialysis. ECF changes estimated by both techniques were compared with actual weight change during the inter- and intradialytic periods. Results. Both techniques tracked fluid changes that correlated well with fluid loss during the dialysis run (WBIS, r = 0.75, P < 0.001; SBIS, r = 0.65, P < 0.001) and fluid gain in the interdialytic period (WBIS, r = 0.73, P < 0.01; SBIS, r = 0.6, P < 0.01). ECF changes estimated by SBIS and WBIS underestimated weight loss 0.78 +/- 0.01 L and 0.6 +/- 0.01 L, respectively; and underestimated weight gain 0.66 +/- 0.18 L and 0.76 +/- 0.18 L, respectively. Conclusions. While both WBIS and SBIS can be used to track relative ECF volume changes in HD patients, they are not accurate in quantifying changes in ECF volume. More studies are needed to evaluate the benefit of SBIS over WBIS in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:2337 / 2342
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Comparing different methods of assessing body composition in end-stage renal failure [J].
Cooper, BA ;
Aslani, A ;
Ryan, M ;
Zhu, FYP ;
Ibels, LS ;
Allen, BJ ;
Pollock, CA .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 58 (01) :408-416
[2]   Optimizing electrode sites for segmental bioimpedance measurements [J].
Cornish, BH ;
Jacobs, A ;
Thomas, BJ ;
Ward, LC .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1999, 20 (03) :241-250
[3]   Predicting body cell mass with bioimpedance by using theoretical methods: A technological review [J].
DeLorenzo, A ;
Andreoli, A ;
Matthie, J ;
Withers, P .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 82 (05) :1542-1558
[4]   Assessment of excess fluid distribution in chronic hemodialysis patients using bioimpedance spectroscopy [J].
Fisch, BJ ;
Spiegel, DM .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 49 (04) :1105-1109
[5]   BIOIMPEDANCE ANALYSIS OF TOTAL-BODY WATER IN HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS [J].
HO, LT ;
KUSHNER, RF ;
SCHOELLER, DA ;
GUDIVAKA, R ;
SPIEGEL, DM .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 46 (05) :1438-1442
[6]  
JABARA AE, 1995, ASAIO J, V41, pM682, DOI 10.1097/00002480-199507000-00098
[7]  
Jaeger JQ, 1999, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V10, P392
[8]  
KUSHNER RF, 1992, J AM COLL NUTR, V11, P199
[9]   SEGMENTAL BIOELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS - THEORY AND APPLICATION OF A NEW TECHNIQUE [J].
ORGAN, LW ;
BRADHAM, GB ;
GORE, DT ;
LOZIER, SL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 77 (01) :98-112
[10]   ESTIMATION OF TOTAL-BODY AND EXTRACELLULAR WATER USING SINGLE-FREQUENCY AND MULTIPLE-FREQUENCY BIOIMPEDANCE [J].
PATEL, RV ;
MATTHIE, JR ;
WITHERS, PO ;
PETERSON, EL ;
ZAROWITZ, BJ .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1994, 28 (05) :565-569