Physician clinical performance assessment - Prospects and barriers

被引:174
作者
Landon, BE
Normand, SLT
Blumenthal, D
Daley, J
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Gen Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Partners Healthcare Syst, Inst Hlth Care, Boston, MA 02114 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2003年 / 290卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.290.9.1183
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The performance of physicians in their day-to-day clinical practices has become an area of intense public interest. Both patients and health care purchasers want more effective means of identifying excellent clinicians, and a variety of organizations are discussing and implementing plans for assessing the performance of individual clinicians. In this article, we review the current state of physician clinical performance assessment with a focus on its usefulness for competency assessment. We describe recommendations for a physician clinical performance assessment system for these purposes, and identify ways in which current methods of performance assessment fall short of these. We conclude that important technical barriers stand in the way of using physician clinical performance assessment for evaluating the competency of individual physicians. Overcoming these barriers will require considerable additional research and development. Even then, for some uses, physician clinical performance assessment at the individual physician level may be technically impossible to accomplish in a valid and fair way.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1189
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] American Medical Association, PHYS CONS PERF IMPR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, ENV NAT HLTH CAR QUA
  • [3] Bentley J M, 1998, Jt Comm J Qual Improv, V24, P40
  • [4] JCAHO accreditation and quality of care for acute myocardial infarction
    Chen, J
    Rathore, SS
    Radford, MJ
    Krumholz, HM
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2003, 22 (02) : 243 - 254
  • [5] Committee on quality of health care in America-Institute of Medicine, 2001, CROSS QUAL CHASM NEW
  • [6] Pitfalls in assessing the quality of care for patients with cardiovascular disease
    DiSalvo, TG
    Normand, SLT
    Hauptman, PJ
    Guadagnoli, E
    Palmer, H
    McNeil, SJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 111 (04) : 297 - 303
  • [7] THE QUALITY OF CARE - HOW CAN IT BE ASSESSED
    DONABEDIAN, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 260 (12): : 1743 - 1748
  • [8] Defining and assessing professional competence
    Epstein, RM
    Hundert, EM
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (02): : 226 - 235
  • [9] Ferris T G, 2000, Eff Clin Pract, V3, P40
  • [10] REPORT CARDS ON CARDIAC-SURGEONS - ASSESSING NEW-YORK STATES APPROACH
    GREEN, J
    WINTFELD, N
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 332 (18) : 1229 - 1232