Physician clinical performance assessment - Prospects and barriers

被引:174
作者
Landon, BE
Normand, SLT
Blumenthal, D
Daley, J
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Gen Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Partners Healthcare Syst, Inst Hlth Care, Boston, MA 02114 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2003年 / 290卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.290.9.1183
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The performance of physicians in their day-to-day clinical practices has become an area of intense public interest. Both patients and health care purchasers want more effective means of identifying excellent clinicians, and a variety of organizations are discussing and implementing plans for assessing the performance of individual clinicians. In this article, we review the current state of physician clinical performance assessment with a focus on its usefulness for competency assessment. We describe recommendations for a physician clinical performance assessment system for these purposes, and identify ways in which current methods of performance assessment fall short of these. We conclude that important technical barriers stand in the way of using physician clinical performance assessment for evaluating the competency of individual physicians. Overcoming these barriers will require considerable additional research and development. Even then, for some uses, physician clinical performance assessment at the individual physician level may be technically impossible to accomplish in a valid and fair way.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1189
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] Statistical methods for profiling providers of medical care: Issues and applications
    Normand, SLT
    Glickman, ME
    Gatsonis, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 92 (439) : 803 - 814
  • [22] Palmer RH, 1996, MED CARE, V34, pSS52
  • [23] Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction - A prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality
    Peabody, JW
    Luck, J
    Glassman, P
    Dresselhaus, TR
    Lee, M
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (13): : 1715 - 1722
  • [24] Comparison of use of medications after acute myocardial infarction in the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare
    Petersen, LA
    Normand, SLT
    Leape, LL
    McNeil, BJ
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (24) : 2898 - 2904
  • [25] USE OF PEER RATINGS TO EVALUATE PHYSICIAN PERFORMANCE
    RAMSEY, PG
    WENRICH, MD
    CARLINE, JD
    INUI, TS
    LARSON, EB
    LOGERFO, JP
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (13): : 1655 - 1660
  • [26] National quality monitoring of medicare health plans - The relationship between enrollees' reports and the quality of clinical care
    Schneider, EC
    Zaslavsky, AM
    Landon, BE
    Lied, TR
    Sheingold, S
    Cleary, PD
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2001, 39 (12) : 1313 - 1325
  • [27] Cardiac surgery report cards: Comprehensive review and statistical critique
    Shahian, DM
    Normand, SL
    Torchiana, DF
    Lewis, SM
    Pastore, JO
    Kuntz, RE
    Dreyer, PI
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (06) : 2155 - 2168
  • [28] Peer review of the quality of care - Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments
    Smith, MA
    Atherly, AJ
    Kane, RL
    Pacala, JT
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (19): : 1573 - 1578
  • [29] STEVENS RA, PROFESSIONAL COMPETE
  • [30] STONE E, 2002, ACCESSING PHYSICIAN