Interactive effects of disturbance and dispersal directionality on species richness and composition in metacommunities

被引:73
作者
Altermatt, Florian [1 ]
Schreiber, Sebastian [2 ]
Holyoak, Marcel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
asymmetric dispersal; density; directionally biased dispersal; ecological gradients; metacommunities; microcosms; species traits; COEXISTENCE; BIODIVERSITY; POPULATION; DIVERSITY; DYNAMICS; CONNECTIVITY; MECHANISMS; MOVEMENT; ECOLOGY; PATTERN;
D O I
10.1890/10-1095.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Dispersal among ecological communities is usually assumed to be random in direction, or to vary in distance or frequency among species. However, a variety of natural systems and types of organisms may experience dispersal that is biased by directional currents or by gravity on hillslopes. We developed a general model for competing species in metacommunities to evaluate the role of directionally biased dispersal on species diversity, abundance, and traits. In parallel, we tested the role of directionally biased dispersal on communities in a microcosm experiment with protists and rotifers. Both the model and experiment independently demonstrated that diversity in local communities was reduced by directionally biased dispersal, especially dispersal that was biased away from disturbed patches. Abundance of species (and composition) in local communities was a product of disturbance intensity but not dispersal directionality. High disturbance selected for species with high intrinsic growth rates and low competitive abilities. Overall, our conclusions about the key role of dispersal directionality in (meta) communities seem robust and general, since they were supported both by the model, which was set in a general framework and not parameterized to fit to a specific system, and by a specific experimental test with microcosms.
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 870
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[41]   Effects of asymmetric dispersal on the coexistence of competing species [J].
Salomon, Yacov ;
Connolly, Sean R. ;
Bode, Lance .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2010, 13 (04) :432-441
[42]   Moving from pattern to process: coexistence mechanisms under intermediate disturbance regimes [J].
Shea, K ;
Roxburgh, SH ;
Rauschert, ESJ .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 7 (06) :491-508
[43]   THE ROLE OF DISTURBANCE IN NATURAL COMMUNITIES [J].
SOUSA, WP .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1984, 15 :353-391
[44]   Landscape geometry determines community response to disturbance [J].
Starzomski, Brian M. ;
Srivastava, Diane S. .
OIKOS, 2007, 116 (04) :690-699
[45]   Disturbance heterogeneity determines freshwater metacommunity structure [J].
Urban, MC .
ECOLOGY, 2004, 85 (11) :2971-2978
[46]   Does colonization asymmetry matter in metapopulations? [J].
Vuilleumier, Severine ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2006, 273 (1594) :1637-1642
[47]   Dispersal and destruction in a multiple habitat system: An experimental approach using protist communities [J].
Warren, PH .
OIKOS, 1996, 77 (02) :317-325