Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: A food production perspective

被引:530
作者
Humphrey, Tom
O'Brien, Sarah
Madsen, Mogens
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Div Vet Pathol Infect & Immun, Sch Clin Vet Sci, Bristol BS40 5DU, Avon, England
[2] Dianova, Aarhus N, Denmark
[3] Univ Manchester, Hope Hosp, Hope Clin Acad Grp, Salford M6 8HD, Lancs, England
关键词
campylobacters; zoonotic pathogens; food production;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.01.006
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Campylobacters remain highly important zoonotic pathogens worldwide which infect an estimated 1% of the population of Western Europe each year. Certain campylobacters are also important in infections of animals, particularly of the reproductive tract, and some are involved in periodontal disease. This paper focuses, however, on the two species which are most important in food-borne infections of humans, Campylobacter (C.)jejuni and C. coli. Infection with these campylobacters is serious in its own right but can also have long-term sequelae such as reactive arthritis and Guillain-Barre syndrome. The pathogens are ubiquitous in nature and in domestic animals and, as a consequence, are found frequently in the environment and on many raw foods, of both plant and animal origin and bacterial numbers can be very high on certain key foods like raw poultry meat. Although all commercial poultry species can carry campylobacters, the risk is greater from chicken because of the high levels of consumption. Campylobacters are relatively 'new' zoonotic pathogens as routine culture from clinical specimens only became possible in the late 1970s. As a consequence there is much that still needs to be understood about the behaviour and pathogenicity of these highly important bacteria. In particular, and from a food industry/food safety perspective, it is important to better understand the behaviour of C. jejuni and C. coli in the food production environment, and how this affects their ability to survive certain food production processes. There is a belief that campylobacters are much more sensitive to hostile conditions than either salmonellas or Escherichia coli. Much of data to support this view have been derived from laboratory experiments and may not fully represent the natural situation. Studies are showing that campylobacters may be more robust than previously thought and thus may represent a greater challenge to food safety. We recommend that research is undertaken to better understand how campylobacters behave in the food chain and how responses to relevant conditions affect their ability to survive processing and their virulence. There is also a need to better understand the reasons why campylobacters are capable of frequent change, particularly in the expression of surface antigens. (C) 2007 ILST Europe. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 257
页数:21
相关论文
共 139 条
[61]   Factors associated with increased and decreased risk of Campylobacter infection:: A prospective case-control study in Norway [J].
Kapperud, G ;
Espeland, G ;
Wahl, E ;
Walde, A ;
Herikstad, H ;
Gustavsen, S ;
Tveit, I ;
Natås, O ;
Bevanger, L ;
Digranes, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 158 (03) :234-242
[62]   Survival of Campylobacter jejuni on various fresh produce [J].
Kärenlampi, R ;
Hänninen, ML .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 97 (02) :187-195
[63]   Temporal and geographical distribution and overlap of Penner heat-stable serotypes and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis genotypes of Campylobacter jejuni isolates collected from humans and chickens in Finland during a seasonal peak [J].
Kärenlampi, R ;
Rautelin, H ;
Hakkinen, M ;
Hänninen, ML .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (10) :4870-4872
[64]   Use of culture, PCR analysis, and DNA microarrays for detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli from chicken feces [J].
Keramas, G ;
Bang, DD ;
Lund, M ;
Madsen, M ;
Bunkenborg, H ;
Telleman, P ;
Christensen, CBV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (09) :3985-3991
[65]   Development of a sensitive DNA microarray suitable for rapid detection of Campylobacter spp [J].
Keramas, G ;
Bang, DD ;
Lund, M ;
Madsen, M ;
Rasmussen, SE ;
Bunkenborg, H ;
Telleman, P ;
Christensen, CBV .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 2003, 17 (04) :187-196
[66]  
KLATKA L, 2002, 3 INT C EM INF DIS A
[67]   Climate variability and campylobacter infection: an international study [J].
Kovats, RS ;
Edwards, SJ ;
Charron, D ;
Cowden, J ;
D'Souza, RM ;
Ebi, KL ;
Gauci, C ;
Gerner-Smidt, P ;
Hajat, S ;
Hales, S ;
Pezzi, GH ;
Kriz, B ;
Kutsar, K ;
McKeown, P ;
Mellou, K ;
Menne, B ;
O'Brien, S ;
van Pelt, W ;
Schmid, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2005, 49 (04) :207-214
[68]   Relevant aspects of Arcobacter spp. as potential foodborne pathogen [J].
Lehner, A ;
Tasara, T ;
Stephan, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 102 (02) :127-135
[69]   A STUDY OF RISK-FACTORS FOR CAMPYLOBACTER INFECTION IN LATE SPRING [J].
LIGHTON, LL ;
KACZMARSKI, EB ;
JONES, DM .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 1991, 105 (03) :199-203
[70]   Temperature-driven campylobacter seasonality in England and Wales [J].
Louis, VR ;
Gillespie, IA ;
O'Brien, SJ ;
Russek-Cohen, E ;
Pearson, AD ;
Colwell, RR .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 71 (01) :85-92