Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients.: (3) evaluation of the haemolysis test

被引:46
作者
Okamoto, Y
Ohkoshi, K
Itagaki, H
Tsuda, T
Kakishima, H
Ogawa, T
Kasai, Y
Ohuchi, J
Kojima, H
Kurishita, A
Kaneko, T
Matsushima, Y
Iwabuchi, Y
Ohno, Y
机构
[1] Japan Cosmet Ind Assoc, Minato Ku, Tokyo 105, Japan
[2] Kose Corp, Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 174, Japan
[3] Shiseido Safety & Analyt Res Ctr, Kohoku Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223, Japan
[4] Kanebo Ltd, Cosmet Lab, Odawara, Kanagawa 256, Japan
[5] Kao Corp, Biol Sci Labs, Haga, Tochigi 32134, Japan
[6] Nippon Menard Cosmet Co Ltd, Inst Res, Nishi Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 451, Japan
[7] Proctor & Gamble Far E Inc, Kobe Tect Ctr, Professional & Regulatory Serv Regulatory & Clin, Higashinada Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 658, Japan
[8] Natl Inst Hlth Sci, Div Toxicol, Biol Safety Res Ctr, Setagaya Ku, Tokyo 158, Japan
[9] Natl Inst Hlth Sci, Div Pharmacol, Biol Safety Res Ctr, Setagaya Ku, Tokyo 158, Japan
关键词
validation study; Draize eye irritation test; haemolysis test; in vitro; red blood cells;
D O I
10.1016/S0887-2333(98)00066-6
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 [卫生毒理学];
摘要
The haemolysis test using sheep red blood cells (RBC) was evaluated as an alternative method to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test (Draize test) by six to nine laboratories. The participating laboratories performed the test according to the standard operating procedure (SOP). Thirty-eight cosmetic ingredients and isotonic sodium chloride solution were used as test substances in this validation study. The concentrations of the test substances that induced 50% haemolysis (HC50 value) was obtained to serve as a toxicological index and compared with in vivo Draize scores. HC50 values were not obtained for coloured or water-insoluble (turbid) substances. Three acids caused denaturation of haemoglobin leaked from RBC and consequently interfered with the determination of the HC50 value. Interlaboratory reproducibility was relatively good except in the case of water-insoluble substances. The average values of coefficient of variation (CV) was 37%. The correlation coefficient and Spearman's rank correlation between the HC50 value and maximum average Draize total score (MAS) were -0.631 and 0.641, respectively. The equivalence ratio between the haemolysis test and MAS was 70.0% when MAS 15 was set as the in vivo cut-off point. On the other hand, strong irritants (MAS greater than or equal to 50) could be correctly classified by this method. These results suggest that the haemolysis test might be applied to cosmetic ingredients as a screening method to distinguish strong irritants that directly affect the cell membrane permeability and do not disturb spectrophotometrical determination of haemoglobin. In order to evaluate the potential for eye irritation of cosmetic ingredients, a combination of haemolysis with other methods based on different mechanism should be employed to improve the predictability. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 124
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
THE SDA ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM PHASE-III - COMPARISON OF IN-VITRO DATA WITH ANIMAL EYE IRRITATION DATA ON SOLVENTS, SURFACTANTS, OXIDIZING-AGENTS, AND PROTOTYPE CLEANING PRODUCTS [J].
BAGLEY, D ;
BOOMAN, KA ;
BRUNER, LH ;
CASTERTON, PL ;
DEMETRULIAS, J ;
HEINZE, JE ;
INNIS, JD ;
MCCORMICK, WC ;
NEUN, DJ ;
ROTHENSTEIN, AS ;
SEDLAK, RI .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY-CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 13 (02) :127-155
[2]
BALLS M, 1990, ATLA-ALTERN LAB ANIM, V18, P313
[3]
TOXICITY OF SOAPS AND DETERGENTS [J].
BETTLEY, FR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1968, 80 (10) :635-&
[4]
TOXICITY DETERMINED INVITRO BY MORPHOLOGICAL ALTERATIONS AND NEUTRAL RED ABSORPTION [J].
BORENFREUND, E ;
PUERNER, JA .
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 1985, 24 (2-3) :119-124
[5]
Draize J., 1959, APPRAISAL SAFETY CHE, P46
[6]
The CFTA evaluation of alternatives program: An evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize primary eye irritation test. (Phase III) surfactant-based formulations [J].
Gettings, SD ;
Lordo, RA ;
Hintze, KL ;
Bagley, DM ;
Casterton, PL ;
Chudkowski, M ;
Curren, RD ;
Demetrulias, JL ;
Dipasquale, LC ;
Earl, LK ;
Feder, PI ;
Galli, CL ;
Glaza, SM ;
Gordon, VC ;
Janus, J ;
Kurtz, PJ ;
Marenus, KD ;
Moral, J ;
Pape, WJW ;
Renskers, KJ ;
Rheins, LA ;
Roddy, MT ;
Rozen, MG ;
Tedeschi, JP ;
Zyracki, J .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 34 (01) :79-117
[7]
IRAG working group 4 - Cell cytotoxicity assays [J].
Harbell, JW ;
Koontz, SW ;
Lewis, RW ;
Lovell, D ;
Acosta, D .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 35 (01) :79-126
[8]
MULTIVARIATE FACTORIAL ANALYSIS OF DATA OBTAINED IN 7 IN-VITRO TEST SYSTEMS FOR PREDICTING EYE IRRITANCY [J].
HAYASHI, T ;
ITAGAKI, H ;
FUKUDA, T ;
TAMURA, U ;
KATO, S .
TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1994, 8 (02) :215-220
[9]
ISOMAA B, 1992, ATLA-ALTERN LAB ANIM, V20, P226
[10]
Kay J. H., 1962, J SOC COSMET CHEM, V13, P281