An assessment of the validity of adolescent self-reported smoking using three biological indicators

被引:169
作者
Dolcini, MM
Adler, NE
Lee, P
Bauman, KE
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Hlth & Community, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Ctr AIDS Prevent Studies, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pediat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Univ Alabama, Sch Publ Hlth, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Res Triangle Inst, Stat Hlth & Social Policy Unit, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/1462220031000118586
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
This research examined the validity of self-reports of adolescent smoking and explored factors that may influence agreement between self-reported smoking and biological indicators. Data were obtained from 1,881 adolescents as part of a household probability study in the southeastern United States. Adolescents aged 12-14 years reported their tobacco use and provided breath and saliva samples. The sensitivity and specificity of self-reports of smoking were calculated with measures of carbon monoxide, salivary cotinine, and salivary thiocyanate as standards. When the self-report items were compatible with the half-life of the biological indicator, and values were adjusted for smokeless tobacco use, sensitivity varied widely (carbon monoxide, 38%; cotinine, 81%-87%; thiocyanate, 80%). The range for specificity was more constrained (carbon monoxide, 98%; cotinine, 98%; thiocyanate, 80%). Sensitivity of self-report was influenced by the biological indicator examined and the timeframe of questions on smoking. Specificity of self-report was influenced by the biological indicator examined and use of other tobacco products. Overall, sensitivity and specificity were highest when recent smoking was assessed and when cotinine was the standard and smokeless tobacco use was considered. Examination of inhalation patterns suggested that detection of smoking may be influenced by recency of smoking and whether the adolescent smoker inhales. Assessments of individual adolescents' smoking were most accurate when smoking was recent and when cotinine was used and smokeless tobacco could be identified. Prevalence estimates of smoking were similar with self-reports and cotinine.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 483
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[41]  
Walsh MM, 2000, TOB CONTROL, V9, P32
[42]   What's a cigarette company to do? [J].
Warner, KE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 92 (06) :897-900
[43]   The validity of self-reports of smoking: Analyses by race/ethnicity in a school sample of urban adolescents [J].
Wills, TA ;
Cleary, SD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 87 (01) :56-61
[44]   AN ITERATIVE TECHNIQUE FOR IDENTIFYING SMOKING DECEIVERS WITH APPLICATION TO THE SCOTTISH HEART HEALTH STUDY [J].
WOODWARD, M ;
TUNSTALLPEDOE, H .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1992, 21 (01) :88-97
[45]  
[No title captured]