The clinical pharmacology of loop diuretics in the pediatric patient

被引:44
作者
Eades, SK [1 ]
Christensen, ML [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Clin Pharm, Crippled Childrens Fdn, Res Ctr,Pediat Pharmacol Res Unit, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
关键词
loop diuretics; furosemide; bumetanide; tolerance;
D O I
10.1007/s004670050514
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The loop diuretics furosemide and bumetanide are frequently employed in the pediatric population for the management of fluid overload in both acute and chronic disease states. They act mainly by inhibiting sodium reabsorption in the nephron at the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop. Important pharmacokinetic differences between adults and infants include a reduced clearance and prolonged half-life, that may cause accumulation of these agents to potentially toxic levels if dosing intervals are not adjusted. Unfortunately, little is known about the time required for maturation of loop diuretic elimination in older infants, children, and adolescents. Similar to adults, limited pharmacodynamic evidence in neonates suggests that a maximally efficient diuretic dose exists. Increasing the diuretic dose beyond this maximum does not offer further benefit, but may increase the risk of toxicity. Common problems encountered in the pediatric patient as well as in adults are loop diuretic tolerance and resistance. Loop diuretic dosing strategies aimed at overcoming these phenomena include administration by continuous infusion, coadministration with albumin, and coadministration with metolazone or thiazides. This article reviews the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of furosemide and bumetanide in pediatric patients. A better understanding of the clinical pharmacology of the loop diuretics should aid clinicians in the development of dosing regimens aimed at producing adequate diuresis without promoting excessive diuretic tolerance.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 616
页数:14
相关论文
共 131 条
[21]   RESISTANCE TO LOOP DIURETICS - WHY IT HAPPENS AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT [J].
BRATER, DC .
DRUGS, 1985, 30 (05) :427-443
[22]  
BRATER DC, 1994, BRIT HEART J, V72, P40
[23]   RESPONSE TO FUROSEMIDE IN CHRONIC RENAL-INSUFFICIENCY - RATIONALE FOR LIMITED DOSES [J].
BRATER, DC ;
ANDERSON, SA ;
BROWNCARTWRIGHT, D .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1986, 40 (02) :134-139
[24]   COMPARATIVE OTOTOXICITY OF BUMETANIDE AND FUROSEMIDE WHEN USED IN COMBINATION WITH KANAMYCIN [J].
BRUMMETT, RE ;
BENDRICK, T ;
HIMES, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1981, 21 (11-1) :628-636
[25]  
CACHERO SD, 1990, CHILD NEPHROL UROL, V10, P161
[26]   Effect of diuretics on urinary oxalate, calcium, and sodium excretion in very low birth weight infants [J].
Campfield, T ;
Braden, G ;
FlynnValone, P ;
Powell, S .
PEDIATRICS, 1997, 99 (06) :814-818
[27]   CUMULATIVE INCREASE IN SERUM FUROSEMIDE CONCENTRATION FOLLOWING REPEATED DOSES IN THE NEWBORN [J].
CHEMTOB, S ;
PAPAGEORGIOU, A ;
DUSOUICH, P ;
ARANDA, JV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1987, 4 (03) :203-205
[28]   PHARMACODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF THE FUROSEMIDE-PROBENECID INTERACTION IN MAN [J].
CHENNAVASIN, P ;
SEIWELL, R ;
BRATER, DC ;
LIANG, WMM .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1979, 16 (02) :187-195
[29]  
COHANIM M, 1980, INVEST UROL, V18, P170
[30]  
CONSTANZO LS, 1984, J CLIN INVEST, V54, P628