The chilling effect and family secrets - Examining the role of self protection, other protection, and communication efficacy

被引:66
作者
Afifi, TD [1 ]
Olson, LN
Armstrong, C
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Columbia, MO USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/hcr/31.4.564
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Two studies were conducted to test a theoretical model of the psychological and communicative links that mediate the impact of the chilling effect on the continued concealment of secrets in families. More specifically, we argued that individuals' continued concealment of a secret from aggressive family members would be mediated by the desire for protection (both of self and others). It was also hypothesized that the need for protection would negatively influence whether people felt that they had the communication efficacy to reveal their secret to these family members, which would also foster continued concealment. The results from Study One suggested that protection mediated the connection between family members' aggression and individuals' concealment of secrets from them. In addition, regardless of whether people believed they could communicate the secret to aggressive family members or not, they were likely to continue to conceal the secret if they were afraid that it would either hurt themselves or others. Results from follow up interviews in Study Two verified the model and also elaborated on the role of communication efficacy in this process.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 598
页数:35
相关论文
共 62 条
[51]  
Sobel M.E., 1982, SOCIOL METHODOL, V13, P290, DOI [10.2307/270723, DOI 10.2307/270723]
[52]  
Solomon D. H., 2004, COMMUNICATION STUDIE, V55, P146, DOI [DOI 10.1080/10510970409388610, 10.1080/10510970409388610]
[53]   Power and problem appraisal: Perceptual foundations of the chilling effect in dating relationships [J].
Solomon, DH ;
Samp, JA .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1998, 15 (02) :191-209
[54]   A Monte Carlo simulation of observable versus latent variable structural equation modeling techniques [J].
Stephenson, MT ;
Holbert, RL .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (03) :332-354
[55]  
Straus M.A., 1990, PHYS VIOLENCE AM FAM, P29, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315126401-4
[56]   VERBAL SYMBOLIC AGGRESSION IN COUPLES - INCIDENCE RATES AND RELATIONSHIPS TO PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS [J].
STRAUS, MA ;
SWEET, S .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1992, 54 (02) :346-357
[57]  
Strauss A., 1998, Basics of qualitative research techniques
[58]  
Stutman R. K., 1990, ARGUMENTATION, V4, P185, DOI [10.1007/BF00175422, DOI 10.1007/BF00175422]
[59]   Revealing family secrets: The influence of topic, function, and relationships [J].
Vangelisti, AL ;
Caughlin, JP .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1997, 14 (05) :679-705
[60]   FAMILY SECRETS - FORMS, FUNCTIONS AND CORRELATES [J].
VANGELISTI, AL .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1994, 11 (01) :113-135