The Digital Divide Among Twitter Users and Its Implications for Social Research

被引:157
作者
Blank, Grant [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford Internet Inst, 1 St Giles, Oxford OX1 3JS, England
关键词
social media; Twitter; representativeness; selection bias; elites; Oxford Internet Survey (OxIS); Pew Internet and American Life; INTERNET; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1177/0894439316671698
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Hundreds of papers have been published using Twitter data, but few previous papers report the digital divide among Twitter users. British Twitter users are younger, wealthier, and better educated than other Internet users, who in turn are younger, wealthier, and better educated than the off-line British population. American Twitter users are also younger and wealthier than the rest of the population, but they are not better educated. Twitter users are disproportionately members of elites in both countries. Twitter users also differ from other groups in their online activities and their attitudes. These biases and differences have important implications for research based on Twitter data. The unrepresentative characteristics of Twitter users suggest that Twitter data are not suitable for research where representativeness is important, such as forecasting elections or gaining insight into attitudes, sentiments, or activities of large populations. In general, Twitter data seem to be more suitable for corporate use than for social science research.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 697
页数:19
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]   Does Twitter matter? The impact of microblogging word of mouth on consumers' adoption of new movies [J].
Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten ;
Wiertz, Caroline ;
Feldhaus, Fabian .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2015, 43 (03) :375-394
[22]   Computational Social Science: Research Strategies, Design and Methods Introduction [J].
Housley, William ;
Williams, Matthew ;
Williams, Malcolm ;
Edwards, Adam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 16 (03) :173-175
[23]   Can we vote with our tweet? On the perennial difficulty of election forecasting with social media [J].
Huberty, Mark .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2015, 31 (03) :992-1007
[24]   Understanding the predictive power of social media [J].
Kalampokis, Evangelos ;
Tambouris, Efthimios ;
Tarabanis, Konstantinos .
INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 23 (05) :544-559
[25]  
Leetaru K., 2013, 1 MONDAY, DOI 10.5210/fm.v18i5.4366
[26]  
MICHAEL J., 2007, 40000 NAMEN ANREDEBE
[27]  
Mustafaraj E., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (PASSAT/SocialCom 2011), P103, DOI 10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.188
[28]  
Pennacchiotti M., 2011, ACM SIGKDD INT C KNO, P430, DOI DOI 10.1145/2020408.2020477
[29]  
Pew Research Center, 2013, ONL DAT PREL
[30]  
Rao D., 2010, P 2 INT WORKSH SEARC, P37, DOI [10.1145/1871985.1871993, DOI 10.1145/1871985.1871993]